RE: Question: purpose of LMP ChannelActive message (was relations hip of RSVP-TE and LMP)
Jonathan Lang <jplang@calient.net> Tue, 18 September 2001 16:23 UTC
Envelope-to: ccamp-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:32:51 -0700
Message-ID: <C12BBE1C7A8F7344808CD8C2A345DFB84556D0@pulsar.chromisys.com>
From: Jonathan Lang <jplang@calient.net>
To: 'George Young' <george.young@edgeflow.com>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: Question: purpose of LMP ChannelActive message (was relations hip of RSVP-TE and LMP)
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:23:51 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
George, Sorry, I missed this one. See inline. -Jonathan > -----Original Message----- > From: George Young [mailto:george.young@edgeflow.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 6:05 AM > To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org > Subject: Question: purpose of LMP ChannelActive message (was > relationship of RSVP-TE and LMP) > > > Didn't see any answers to this question, so I'll try to rephrase and > make it more focused. > > What is the purpose of the LMP ChannelActive message? The ChannelActive message is used to indicate that the channel status is active and should be monitored. > > I'm assuming a call is set up through an optical cross connect (OXC), > either in response to control plane signalling (e.g. RSVP-TE) or > management plane input. > The OXC has knowledge of which optical links are involved > with the call for failure monitoring purposes. > > What additional information would the receipt of a > ChannelActive message convey? This is useful when paths are pre-established (e.g., for path protection). Although signaling is used to setup the resource reservation, on switchover you need a mechanism to trigger monitoring of the data channel. > > Regards, > George. > edgeflow Inc. > 329 March Rd., Kanata, ON, Canada, K2K 2E1 > phone: +1 613-270-9279 Ext 287 > fax: +1 613-270-9268 > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: George Young > >Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:47 PM > >To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org > >Subject: relationship of RSVP-TE and LMP > > > > > >I have two questions about the relationship of RSVP-TE > >(draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-03.txt) and LMP > >(draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-00.txt). > > > >First of all, my understanding of the LMP ChannelActive > message is that > >it is used to indicate to the downstream (relative to data flow > >direction) node that monitoring should be used. > > > >The scenario I have in mind is an RSVP call setup consisting of a > >bidirectional optical path. Presumably a switching node has > to reserve > >data channels and associate them with the optical path when an > >RSVP PATH > >message arrives. > > > >1) My first question is what is the timing of LMP > >ChannelActive messages > >relative to RSVP messages. > > > >Do ChannelActive messages flow downstream (relative to call > >establishment direction) more-or-less in phase with PATH > messages, and > >upstream (relative to call establishment direction) more-or-less in > >phase with RESV messages? > > > >2) My second question is what addtional information information do > >ChannelActive messages provide? > > > >If a link is to be monitored when associated with an active call, it > >appears the node already has this information. > > > >Regards, > >George. > >edgeflow Inc. > >329 March Rd., Kanata, ON, Canada, K2K 2E1 > >phone: +1 613-270-9279 Ext 287 > >fax: +1 613-270-9268 > > > > > > >
- RE: Question: purpose of LMP ChannelActive messag… Jonathan Lang
- RE: Question: purpose of LMP ChannelActive messag… Jonathan Lang
- RE: Question: purpose of LMP ChannelActive messag… Jonathan Lang