[CCAMP] John Scudder's Yes on draft-ietf-ccamp-mw-topo-yang-10: (with COMMENT)

[John Scudder via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ccamp-mw-topo-yang-10: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-mw-topo-yang/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for this document. I have some minor comments below, that I hope may be
helpful. Also, thanks to Éric for being special guest AD, and to Daniele for
the shepherd write-up.

### Section 1.1, unused terms

MSDC is defined but only used once... prior to this section, and with in-line
expansion already. So, I think the abbreviation can be removed.

Same for PNC.

### Section 1.2, incorrect xref

“A simplified graphical representation of the data model is used in chapter 3.1
of this document.”

RFCs don’t have “chapters”, they have “sections”, but more importantly this
document doesn’t have a section (or chapter) 3.1. I guess you need to update
your cross reference. Probably you mean Section 2.1?

### Appendices

Thank you for the clear diagrams, they’re very helpful. Just curious, what tool
did you use to produce them? (Assuming the different renderings weren't
hand-crafted that is.)