IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] Question you raised on failing to assing WA method.

"Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" <giomarti@cisco.com> Mon, 21 July 2014 19:52 UTC

Return-Path: <giomarti@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0AC1A0397 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tmcwp8hsKYJR for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3A9F1A03C8 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3411; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1405972333; x=1407181933; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=vlZ0YPTDDQu1xSvrHsUEELsbFVr5/sBYO0bPNEv6VpM=; b=SbG84CuxKgSRuRgBmeMoxnQeSB/fG99xXWq+43tSnDWpFrydkuxxMicg e/omfC658oQDIstXbf27hq6VHriHa6dCi9xHfsZp8QZLMIL+h0VjZAk8w gFO3MVm7wafGyZ76a7GhurODI6bDR/XUAOLdb4dnxlfWmDKPQrtTtLxyG c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah4FAFBuzVOtJV2P/2dsb2JhbABZgkdHUlcExm8BCYdFAYEfFnaEBAEBBAEBAWsLEAIBCAQ7BycLFBEBAQQOBYhCDb5wEwSPRwQHgy6BGAWbJZQvg0RsgUU
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,703,1400025600"; d="scan'208,217";a="341743850"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Jul 2014 19:52:12 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com [173.36.12.82]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6LJqC6D021292 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 21 Jul 2014 19:52:12 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.221]) by xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com ([173.36.12.82]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:52:11 -0500
From: "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" <giomarti@cisco.com>
To: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Question you raised on failing to assing WA method.
Thread-Index: Ac+lHMTjNdPVabBdTpCimcZklavqjwAKma6A
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 19:52:11 +0000
Message-ID: <97679D9B-DAD3-4EBF-884C-F9E82B0A47A9@cisco.com>
References: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E1729C02FA9@dfweml706-chm.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E1729C02FA9@dfweml706-chm.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.61.110.50]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_97679D9BDAD34EBF884CF9E82B0A47A9ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/xIQabBNgG_FGVxOVO4D8SHuq_r4
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Question you raised on failing to assing WA method.
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 19:52:14 -0000

and even more “if a node cannot allocate the (physical, i.e. a regenerator block) resource, what happens?”

correct?

Cheers
G


On 21 Jul 2014, at 15:48, Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com<mailto:leeyoung@huawei.com>> wrote:

Hi Lou,

Would you be able to re-phrase what you asked in regard to “what happens what wavelength assignment has failed”? Is this the correct statement?

Thanks,
Young
_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org<mailto:CCAMP@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email