Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-margaria-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ero-02

Hi Lou, 

Yes - that works for me.  It would be good to progress this draft.  

Ben

-----Original Message-----
From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net] 
Sent: 23 January 2013 18:47
To: NSN - Cyril Margaria; dirk.schroetter@nutsix.de; Cisco - Giovanni Martinelli; Steve Balls; Ben Wright
Cc: CCAMP
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-margaria-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ero-02

Authors, WG,
	It seems that Dirk is no longer active in our WG or on the draft. We'd like to propose the following in order to unblock progress on this draft:

1) That Dirk's name be removed from the Authors/Contributor's section

2) That Dirk's contribution to this draft to date be recognized in the
   Acknowledgments section

3) That these changes be made in
   draft-margaria-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ero-03

4) That draft-margaria-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ero-03 then be accepted as
   a WG document based the results of last month's poll
   (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/current/msg14293.html)

5) That, baring any substantive objections, that the above take place
   on or after Jan 31.

We can revisit 1 & 2 if Dirk responds to the IPR poll in future.

Thoughts/comments?

Lou (and Deborah)

On 1/14/2013 12:05 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
> Dirk,
> 	Please respond so that we can move this draft forward.
> 
> Thank you,
> Lou
> 
> PS CCAMP, if anyone knows how to contact Dirk please forward this 
> message to him, or let us know who to reach him.
> 
> On 12/4/2012 6:00 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
>> Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP)
>>
>> As part of the preparation for the poll on making this document a WG
>> document:
>>
>> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to 
>> draft-margaria-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ero-02?
>>
>>   Please state either:
>>
>>   "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>>   or
>>   "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>>
>> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules 
>> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>>
>>    If yes to the above, please state either:
>>
>>   "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>>   or
>>   "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>>
>>   If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>>   appropriate.
>>
>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer 
>> the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not 
>> you are aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to 
>> the next stage until a response has been received from each author 
>> and listed contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN 
>> THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>>
>> If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author 
>> or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR 
>> rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR 
>> of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating 
>> in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.  
>> For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and 
>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> CCAMP WG Chairs
>>
>> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your 
>> response.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CCAMP mailing list
>> CCAMP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> 
> 
> 
> 