IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CDNi] draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-05 excludes IPv6 addresses, is that intentional?

"Ori Finkelman (IETF)" <ori.finkelman.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 09 September 2019 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <orifinkelman@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE1112093B; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 11:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1FMPGoYXg7uD; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 11:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe34.google.com (mail-vs1-xe34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04C3F120914; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 11:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe34.google.com with SMTP id s18so9427591vsa.0; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 11:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3BNLwRQLZNaybPpV8bs3/sVsjOruOHxkC8V5k4CDlvI=; b=OHS982M0Ox7885xyGeqdEwVEEC9t79WGN5J73iYGEEoV1lBCyKDINiFbkOEoWODosJ Q7pbDLMSpGdGLChJ/BTiIeVS5WrSHGD5SgqTqS8mchvuJ+lFHlMhAtfhxNKJ6Ag64KsG /mZOsvRlpyqhShQ84RURnnUAPFPZyYK7iAODt73sil9cu+2UkxVLEqKW+GKAnAqfGscI D/uzOkHqVvR6pm9h7G6C7s3vtVd/mFzZFtTl16FLHws1aq34DeIKnxebTIbxjP3jx1F8 Hmqf6LCpMvFSbX7XMS8ezIuBG6y3DZKeOt+LEdjYgfyo3l91ssVvRJ+OQCQahQPP5ArX AxKA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3BNLwRQLZNaybPpV8bs3/sVsjOruOHxkC8V5k4CDlvI=; b=fgSCgz8Bi9pNQRagOwqIoK7OyPC8D+0N3CS+D6iFajAWT6zij5R9KE2sq8KKc1kk7g DGETUaB3gUFIHcKrS3/PjUzZrUxFEtMK8O9AkZauaE5cOIFwXmMgE6m8+v1aPbOZ/ZOA PwDxY8U+eJgEgKOjUGqPyzh5XqzQRXB3VrlnMaBV7WUUf/9K/QEKQVRoNiXmmjTVrusX lM95X2kErDo6FGI6NnDmJhCNfkSL2P9Xqhy34DJRRA7/MfCcaJaWA23XoP4ux5Ke9+go qq5QsPUD4WdMrqYjIS2w8WvhD71EQfS9To+Em/rYx2MfaEleKEvwO51eoGaIJI3noU53 N6hQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAURwdHQkA3Sy+y3m37xvapKoqjif7B4auYf5lHs2OsXTTO9pIlZ X7Qsx3EWpDPVEtcWKqaYie/OWJXOXXlsJq9Bht/4jcda
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz35h4htDcDnTjQWBQOMaYBmYetqxrsiGuO18/gIa/8WNuaHPGhcKZ/Pl6AsDkbz5dHtAWekTD3VE85nzIYJNc=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:6a07:: with SMTP id f7mr13682384vsc.55.1568052055502; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 11:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <66A6FCE6-53A4-4449-BBBD-3CFC774BC9FC@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <66A6FCE6-53A4-4449-BBBD-3CFC774BC9FC@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
From: "Ori Finkelman (IETF)" <ori.finkelman.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 21:00:38 +0300
Message-ID: <CAM8emGXqRitMfx0YztA+FsnH0MrutsQKCX9D9nfYh_vWXqM8ng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ben Niven-Jenkins <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
Cc: "<cdni@ietf.org>" <cdni@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c1f7f505922291d0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/-E0E5Yn7EBc9414TUjf7gKtSpE0>
Subject: Re: [CDNi] draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-05 excludes IPv6 addresses, is that intentional?
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 18:01:17 -0000

Thanks Ben for the catch, indeed an oversight on my part.
I will fix it for the next revision.

Best regards,
Ori

On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 7:10 PM Ben Niven-Jenkins <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
wrote:

> CDNIers & authors of draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions
>
> While reviewing draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-05 in my role
> as designated expert for the CDNI Payload Types registry I noticed that
> draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-05 specifies the DnsTarget of
> the Redirect Target Capability Object (section 2.1) as: “Target address for
> a DNS A record or CNAME record.” and the prose description in section 2 is
> consistent with that definition: "A redirect target for DNS redirection is
> an IP address used as an A record response or a FQDN used as an alias in a
> CNAME record response (see [RFC1034]) of the uCDN DNS router.”
>
> Is there a reason that IPv6 addresses (AAAA records) are excluded from
> being allowed as DnsTargets, or is this an oversight?
>
> Thanks
> Ben
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email