IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CDNi] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-cdni-logging-26: (with COMMENT)

Francois Le Faucheur <flefauch@gmail.com> Wed, 01 June 2016 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <flefauch@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F9FE12D0DD; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 09:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DSviakY52GKG; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 09:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41AD612D54F; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 09:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id a136so190536392wme.0; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 09:17:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=vn82tiPBaYD4IYat15aQmddTonKfgAkgHtwnEtRY0vQ=; b=TtrDYi3QXjIzNOj/30FhZ5zDtNrxwPckRc0C5VxtSjDHvVgnfyla0w8ky3GZ3BasBn Un8zdY1u2BmmDK2Cjsu167oYKgjtdqb0hQWbYSE9QRfOCA0idT8veLDa3n4eP4/bvUcp LGRc+JMUANEmtWoYJdTLH4UxF1OQqzADcs88ZNSMkRLNkLss+B6q9k5wiew5UX2+kmO5 rcJyCVu5zkfPYj6QeyRB7vFLI+983+W+eDFr318deyDc5A9aMFjSivaAEysFiuUpUjMQ sVRWkJS3cgqayvNpjZMjcnwQc2a415izPSoj/a2umtkWWQTTRDGO21h7b34p/aVUMrVK +Tfg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=vn82tiPBaYD4IYat15aQmddTonKfgAkgHtwnEtRY0vQ=; b=ATbaI4kJvK99UvQ8BNWQ8l3CxtXqA04S+2pKMikT9PF5x4wJ0qsvoMYizx6bhuqpmi 6DMzHg0I2ifQZS1MG6c2NNpkbPEIBicO/0pXhM8Pkdo1b9LocGtQ8a8GkuUaRGxONAe3 jlis/Mzi3Qg9qGMPBCmKSIItXDPEk9uPHEE02JPzpDKzIXIwyFXhh/nNphF8BJKli53Z VOaMs4j0hUti7sWpjP5uAwDBBwJyf4yId2Y2goyKe8QEeQzyVcLkDHWxQ6DZ/NSe8g8I rqKXPsuHP2STp78lb1frQRmNnP8ssIC3fgs9GD+4L2PACsyEW1lTe9AzYXHwI4Dziihe VbRA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLUvI++pItcfWbGqIDJjh4nhGhrgjtaDs1HHUthC3ZJlDdBDTbl4Bf691rb6DM2Cg==
X-Received: by 10.28.54.150 with SMTP id y22mr4350883wmh.70.1464797871695; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 09:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.21] (125.216.113.78.rev.sfr.net. [78.113.216.125]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v5sm29649158wjv.36.2016.06.01.09.17.50 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Jun 2016 09:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Francois Le Faucheur <flefauch@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160529114300.27632.32780.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 18:17:48 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C5D4433B-1442-4F06-9290-595CF51D4B5F@gmail.com>
References: <20160529114300.27632.32780.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/761kbtWYhxt11Bty2ATD0LQFUPM>
Cc: draft-ietf-cdni-logging@ietf.org, cdni-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, cdni@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CDNi] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-cdni-logging-26: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:17:56 -0000

Hi Alexey,

Thanks for following up. See below:

> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS points.
> 
> Ok, you now clarified that version names are case-insensitive. However I
> didn't get this impression while reading 3.3, as there is no version ABNF
> there. So you might want to say that earlier in the document as well.

Fair enough. I added a statement about case -insensitive for each of the directives, version, value, field names where there are respectively defined (under 3.3 and 3.4)


> 
> In 7.1, last sentence: TLS only provides for protection from tampering
> when in transit, not when a log file being stored.

I already responded to that point and corrected the sentence so it now reads:
“
Protection against third party tampering, when the CDNI Logging File is communicated over the CDN Logging Interface, can be achieved as discussed above through the use of TLS.
“

Is it not acceptable ?

Cheers

Francois

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email