IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CDNi] New version (and IPR statement) of draft-brandenburg-cdni-uri-signing-for-has

Kevin Ma J <kevin.j.ma@ericsson.com> Sat, 11 June 2016 18:57 UTC

Return-Path: <kevin.j.ma@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1F112D79A for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 11:57:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wsdzg5vjqqXL for <cdni@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 11:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usplmg20.ericsson.net (usplmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32BED12D776 for <cdni@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 11:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c618062d-f79886d000002334-80-575c558f736c
Received: from EUSAAHC003.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.81]) by usplmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id BD.86.09012.F855C575; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 20:16:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUSAAMB103.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.120]) by EUSAAHC003.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0294.000; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 14:56:58 -0400
From: Kevin Ma J <kevin.j.ma@ericsson.com>
To: "Brandenburg, R. (Ray) van" <ray.vanbrandenburg@tno.nl>, "cdni@ietf.org" <cdni@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New version (and IPR statement) of draft-brandenburg-cdni-uri-signing-for-has
Thread-Index: AQHRwy2I54wAQQPyYkOQMx8zvzoaI5/kbdJg
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 18:56:58 +0000
Message-ID: <A419F67F880AB2468214E154CB8A556206E10D82@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
References: <90041886-D253-413F-B006-50BDA558EB12@tno.nl>
In-Reply-To: <90041886-D253-413F-B006-50BDA558EB12@tno.nl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.11]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A419F67F880AB2468214E154CB8A556206E10D82eusaamb103erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpjkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZXLonULc/NCbcYNJHI4uns/+wWnzbfJ3R gcljyZKfTB4H111gDmCK4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4MqYemw/e8GE9IrOZ5ENjCtSuhg5OSQETCRu nb/LCmGLSVy4t56ti5GLQ0jgKKPE/GVLWSCc5YwSf3Y+ZgOpYhPQknj89S8TiC0iECex49gZ RhBbWCBG4uXUFYwQ8ViJddu3QdlGEnPn/WIGsVkEVCW6d/aC9fIK+Epsun0ObKaQgKXEp03/ 2UFsTgEriQOvXoL1MgJd9P3UGrB6ZgFxiVtP5jNBXCogsWTPeWYIW1Ti5eN/UB8oSXz8PZ8d oj5fYsuuXnaIXYISJ2c+YZnAKDILyahZSMpmISmbxcgBFNeUWL9LH6JEUWJK90N2CFtDonXO XHZk8QWM7KsYOUqLC3Jy040MNjECY+eYBJvuDsb70z0PMQpwMCrx8CZYRIcLsSaWFVfmHmKU 4GBWEuHti44JF+JNSaysSi3Kjy8qzUktPsQozcGiJM4r9kgxXEggPbEkNTs1tSC1CCbLxMEp 1cDYkfa2+41xxrMWznO3fDjCzE/8XsIS5Vom7rZI3suwlCXC4P3bBOk/fwPKjF5vm6WX631y 9UmxKw6Hj8qdvtjz4C/jNqFJh8tOMZjccmg+f1taMX6W9JSO8HrWotvPGVgivv4+XeO6b8eJ h+9+MF3hXfFrg/3Ekyw/z2TUvrErWeHFs9lO/fZ3JZbijERDLeai4kQA8Pvwc5kCAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/Ci9HOcogOvB1IZOlqdjn6tWMLjs>
Subject: Re: [CDNi] New version (and IPR statement) of draft-brandenburg-cdni-uri-signing-for-has
X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" <cdni.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cdni/>
List-Post: <mailto:cdni@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni>, <mailto:cdni-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 18:57:02 -0000

Hi All,

  (As a chair) Per the decision in BA (https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/minutes/minutes-95-cdni), we deferred discussion of whether to (re)adopt draft-brandenburg-cdni-uri-signing-for-has as a WG item.  For historical context, in Prague, we decided to separate the IPR encumbered portion of URI signing from the WG draft (https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/minutes/minutes-93-cdni).

  There is a new IPR disclosure (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2806/) available that folks should take a look at.  Note: I'm not sure if it should have been an update to the previous disclosure (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2652/) or whether that makes a difference?  Alexey?

  If folks have thoughts about whether or not we should (re)adopt the HAS URI signing work, in light of the new IPR disclosure, please send your comments to the list.

thanx!

--  Kevin J. Ma

From: CDNi [mailto:cdni-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brandenburg, R. (Ray) van
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 11:34 AM
To: cdni@ietf.org
Subject: [CDNi] New version (and IPR statement) of draft-brandenburg-cdni-uri-signing-for-has

Hi all,

As you might have seen, I’ve recently uploaded a new version of draft-brandenburg-cdni-uri-signing-for-has (-03).

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brandenburg-cdni-uri-signing-for-has-03

What is important to note is that KPN has updated it’s IPR statement on this document to be in line with the IPR statements that have been filed on other CDNI documents (i.e. “Royalty-Free, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory License to All Implementers”). Hopefully this clears up the lengthy IPR discussion we’ve been having around this document so that we can focus on the technical aspects again.

Looking forward to your feedback,
Ray

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email