Re: [CDNi] New version (and IPR statement) of draft-brandenburg-cdni-uri-signing-for-has

I am in favor of adopting draft-brandenburg-cdni-uri-signing-for-has.

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 12:57 PM Kevin Ma J <kevin.j.ma@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
>
>
>   (As a chair) Per the decision in BA (
> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/minutes/minutes-95-cdni), we deferred
> discussion of whether to (re)adopt
> draft-brandenburg-cdni-uri-signing-for-has as a WG item.  For historical
> context, in Prague, we decided to separate the IPR encumbered portion of
> URI signing from the WG draft (
> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/minutes/minutes-93-cdni).
>
>
>
>   There is a new IPR disclosure (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2806/)
> available that folks should take a look at.  Note: I'm not sure if it
> should have been an update to the previous disclosure (
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2652/) or whether that makes a
> difference?  Alexey?
>
>
>
>   If folks have thoughts about whether or not we should (re)adopt the HAS
> URI signing work, in light of the new IPR disclosure, please send your
> comments to the list.
>
>
>
> thanx!
>
>
>
> --  Kevin J. Ma
>
>
>
> *From:* CDNi [mailto:cdni-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Brandenburg,
> R. (Ray) van
> *Sent:* Friday, June 10, 2016 11:34 AM
> *To:* cdni@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [CDNi] New version (and IPR statement) of
> draft-brandenburg-cdni-uri-signing-for-has
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> As you might have seen, I’ve recently uploaded a new version of
> draft-brandenburg-cdni-uri-signing-for-has (-03).
>
>
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brandenburg-cdni-uri-signing-for-has-03
>
>
>
> What is important to note is that KPN has updated it’s IPR statement on
> this document to be in line with the IPR statements that have been filed on
> other CDNI documents (i.e. “Royalty-Free, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory
> License to All Implementers”). Hopefully this clears up the lengthy IPR
> discussion we’ve been having around this document so that we can focus on
> the technical aspects again.
>
>
>
> Looking forward to your feedback,
>
> Ray
>
>
>
> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you
> are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you
> are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no
> liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use
> it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the
> electronic transmission of messages.
> _______________________________________________
> CDNi mailing list
> CDNi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni
>