[CDNi] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-cdni-delegation-acme-03: (with COMMENT)

[Robert Wilton via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-cdni-delegation-acme-03: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cdni-delegation-acme/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for this document. It is outside my area, and I've not had time to
review it closely.  Just a couple of minor suggestions:

Minor level comments:

(1) p 2, sec 1.1.  Terminology

   This document uses terminology from CDNI framework documents such as:
   CDNI framework document [RFC7336] and CDNI interface specifications
   documents: CDNI Metadata interface [RFC8006] and CDNI Footprint and
   Capabilities Advertisement interface [RFC8008].  It also uses
   terminology from Section 1.1 of [RFC8739].

Please check whether you mean section 1.1 or section 1.2 of RFC8739.

(2) p 4, sec 3.   ACME Delegation Metadata for CDNI

   Figure 1: Example call-flow of STAR delegation in CDNI showing 2
                         levels of delegation

It might be helpful to define what 'CP' and 'CA' are.  Note - I did try and
quickly check the references in the terminology, but I didn't check that
carefully so I might have missed the definitions.

Regards,
Rob