Re: [CDNi] Triggers regexp: draft-finkelman-cdni-sva-extensions-00.txt

I also prefer pcre only.

On Wed, Feb 7, 2018, 17:01 Kevin J. Ma <kevin.j.ma.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would favor triggers matching uri signing, i.e., PCRE only, to simplify
> interoperability requirements; unless there's a really good reason
> implementers should have to support multiple standards?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Feb 7, 2018, at 3:39 AM, Ori Finkelman <orif@qwilt.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Colleagues,
> Regarding the addition of a regular expression match for triggers, mainly
> for invalidation.
> What should be the regexp standard we use, PCRE ? POSIX BRE or ERE ?
> Does the type of regrexp need to be exchanged via the interface (trigger
> and capability) ?
>
> Example 1: assuming we support only one specific type of regrex
>
>     {
>        "regex":
> "/^(https:\/\/video\.example\.com)\/([a-z])\/([1-7])\/([\/\w \.-]*)*\/?$",
>
>        "case-sensitive": true
>     }
>
> Example 2: assuming regexp type is variable
>
>     {
>        "regex":
> "/^(https:\/\/video\.example\.com)\/([a-z])\/([1-7])\/([\/\w \.-]*)*\/?$",
>
>        "case-sensitive": true
>        "regrex-type": "pcre"
>     }
>
> Thanks,
> Ori
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Ori Finkelman*Qwilt | Work: +972-72-2221647 | Mobile: +972-52-3832189 |
> orif@qwilt.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> CDNi mailing list
> CDNi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni
>
>

-- 

*Ori Finkelman*Qwilt | Work: +972-72-2221647 | Mobile: +972-52-3832189 |
orif@qwilt.com