Re: [CDNi] Triggers regexp: draft-finkelman-cdni-sva-extensions-00.txt

I would favor triggers matching uri signing, i.e., PCRE only, to simplify interoperability requirements; unless there's a really good reason implementers should have to support multiple standards?

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 7, 2018, at 3:39 AM, Ori Finkelman <orif@qwilt.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Colleagues,
> Regarding the addition of a regular expression match for triggers, mainly for invalidation.
> What should be the regexp standard we use, PCRE ? POSIX BRE or ERE ?
> Does the type of regrexp need to be exchanged via the interface (trigger and capability) ?
> 
> Example 1: assuming we support only one specific type of regrex
> 
>     { 
>        "regex": "/^(https:\/\/video\.example\.com)\/([a-z])\/([1-7])\/([\/\w \.-]*)*\/?$",    
>        "case-sensitive": true
>     }
> 
> Example 2: assuming regexp type is variable
> 
>     { 
>        "regex": "/^(https:\/\/video\.example\.com)\/([a-z])\/([1-7])\/([\/\w \.-]*)*\/?$",    
>        "case-sensitive": true
>        "regrex-type": "pcre"
>     }
> 
> Thanks,
> Ori
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ori Finkelman
> Qwilt | Work: +972-72-2221647 | Mobile: +972-52-3832189 | orif@qwilt.com
> _______________________________________________
> CDNi mailing list
> CDNi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cdni