IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cellar] purpose of FLAC RFC --- vs xiph.org

"Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe@xiph.org> Thu, 02 November 2023 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <tterribe@xiph.org>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D63C14CE3B for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 10:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.091, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QlI-PAKwFp_1 for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 10:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailfish.xiph.org (mailfish.xiph.org [IPv6:2001:470:eb26:42:5054:ff:fe09:a40c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4DAC14CE55 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 10:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.17.0.18] (50-78-100-113-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.78.100.113]) by mailfish.xiph.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1AC609F87D for <cellar@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 17:51:13 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: cellar@ietf.org
References: <27285.1697739741@localhost> <CADQbU69-YfQMkaAfrdvUTuoDVWAp_xLfK28zH7WxCM7naJCVZg@mail.gmail.com> <18b14722-a36a-e027-6b73-d5d39af6e9bf@xiph.org> <CAKKJt-d+XK=wLPtZjCSYhanaOfhE_TUe+fQ7c464k1sjN+5kjQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe@xiph.org>
Message-ID: <958754cd-9e9d-8c7f-5cf6-44e5bb62f396@xiph.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2023 10:51:09 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.10.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-d+XK=wLPtZjCSYhanaOfhE_TUe+fQ7c464k1sjN+5kjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/6_g3yRPi07UNQcXNos56Nth54Sk>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] purpose of FLAC RFC --- vs xiph.org
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2023 17:51:18 -0000

Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:
> Thank you for the background here. As of our last working group meeting, 
> I think we're going to Do The Right Thing.

I had faith.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email