Re: [Cellar] On the multiplicity of Info elements

["Timothy B. Terriberry" <[e-mail]>]

Dave Rice wrote:
> Listing reasons to not have a CRC Child Element seems awkward.
> Realistically I think the primary reason that CRC elements are not
> used is because many muxers don’t support adding them, although the
> EBML specification has long contained: "All level 1 elements SHOULD
> include a CRC-32.” Instead of addressing reasons why not I added

So this is really, "SHOULD, unless it is too much work for you to bother"?

I say this as someone who has had every SHOULD in one of my own drafts 
systematically dissected with the question, "Why not MUST? When would it 
be okay to violate this SHOULD?" late in the review process. I am trying 
to save you pain further down the line.