IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Cellar] IETF current milestones: request for feedback

Tessa Fallon <tessa.fallon@gmail.com> Tue, 13 September 2016 14:39 UTC

Return-Path: <tessa.fallon@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E7B12B512 for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 07:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OcqOHgZW-raP for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 07:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x22a.google.com (mail-it0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF6A112B515 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 06:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id o3so38220961ita.1 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 06:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=aQxNqh1awvy5AetcBtmBuojEWQimL7Vw0oQPV6hB7hU=; b=oF9SjUnboTtaS0UQtShnAAZLyJIj0nJNfOvB7j46Camkp0RSsllmU2mVVkW+EZvQg0 P5wg1cu+IxMKl5Ir3BCKo13+/ZBePsTp8tZjd7/S1mF6v7L645uzCw+nTYFm5fyJzB+X 3f6xnZNL8qkURdeYotwMuWLRKJ13rutu7Nghz8urZCcAyMu5oxqWc3903CDQ85MFk0C7 iJO2Jg7kv+pxYcNzMlrWQKUGI2Kc+bszbenBC7wKpR9+hMNv6px8N17iHKo1FFPxvl/y /u5K0D6MGXtYqnt3oYulNgxaB2hWY7tuLXRvYaZV+lC2bjNKtHy2f6BZIJAmZUjJKhvS WyMg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=aQxNqh1awvy5AetcBtmBuojEWQimL7Vw0oQPV6hB7hU=; b=jksTKbIp8JY+11RTyozb+3CltvIGb4CNHw2UgYOyi+qXmP1DYvr/jjG7JkgcmGYjRU kNgZIIRLEf0dzpXAL2SiZnOvXfBF5FJczNVN8VIZnqtALrGQKe+c47swO4V6yv3T9S6G mST7XQshavM0imwkKv75mOHjcXKAKG6EE0pSkZ8h9nMnJJZGNaWUuQ0II+6ZyhWJcQ6x UD8C46+iZHfadyGEh0gaPyVk6zkdSqfbhiYuxXrn6nceQcsIIFg8hD5R5uvIHu27fJ8I 6TqmoCROVl2xgKwWGUj3rBC94synBqqn4+wtQ9Wb1o/Y/z858g54W92jpdMSZ9KAGcv5 j3Qw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOMVrgsufudK1JFz4mVUEUoAhjm5NRdsgZ2m335h0iAISOtcc6KijIBYR6me2p4D5clyCZyqdyFy0a6sg==
X-Received: by 10.107.132.28 with SMTP id g28mr1886452iod.11.1473775159562; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 06:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.40.4 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 06:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tessa Fallon <tessa.fallon@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 09:58:39 -0400
Message-ID: <CADK0Wuy3gf25pZX1VZCxEgRu8VAiPJeM6cxy=+epcMkCPrVefg@mail.gmail.com>
To: cellar@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113f377add67fb053c640427"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/UAXRQ6omQRLflYMt6lEpB_nx3x0>
Subject: [Cellar] IETF current milestones: request for feedback
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:39:27 -0000

At the CELLAR meeting in July, it was decided that working group milestones
would need to be revised.   The current list is below.

Would those working on FFV1, EBML, and Matroska weigh in on the state of
the specifications and projected timelines for work to be completed?  I
note that the most recent changes to EBML were submitted on Sunday 9/11.
Where does this leave the document?

Much thanks,
Tessa

Date
Dec 2016 Submit specification for FLAC audio codec to IESG (Standards Track)
Sep 2016 Submit specification for FFV1 video codec version 4 to IESG
(Standards Track)
Jul 2016 Submit specification for Matroska container format version 4 to
IESG (Standards Track)
Jul 2016 Submit informational specification for FFV1 video codec versions
0, 1 and 3 to IESG for publication
Jun 2016 Submit specification for EBML to IESG (Standards Track)
Jun 2016 Submit informational specification for Matroska container format
versions 1, 2 and 3 to IESG for publication

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email