Re: [Cellar] github org name

Fine with the renaming. If the logo is used for the whole CELLAR group, the Matroska one may not be suitable. We might as well use an IETF logo.

> On 23 Nov 2020, at 21:16, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> Dave Rice <dave@dericed.com> wrote:
>>> On Nov 23, 2020, at 1:46 AM, Jerome Martinez <jerome@mediaarea.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 23/11/2020 02:07, Michael Richardson wrote:
>>>>> RFC8875 suggests github organizations be named "ietf-wg-XXXX".  Our
>>>>> is named cellar-wg.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Renaming is not required, but it seems like a good idea to me.  All
>>>>> of RFC8874/8875 are essentially guidelines, best current practices,
>>>>> btw.
>>> 
>>> I am in favor of the renaming.
> 
>> +1
> 
> it is done: https://github.com/ietf-wg-cellar/
> I may re-register the old name with redirects.  Maybe.
> 
>>>> Github says that almost everything will be redirected (repository
>>>> access in particular), but not https://github.com/cellar-wg itself.
>>>> They list that the biggest threat is that old name could get squatted
>>>> on!
>>> 
>>> Sad but we mostly link on repositories so better to do it now than
>>> later.
>>> 
>>>> In looking at the settings, I noticed that we could upload a logo.
>>>> Does EBML/FFV1/Matroska have a logo?  Some IETF WGs have created a
>>>> logo.
>>> 
>>> We could use the Matroska one while waiting for finding a more generic
>>> one.
> 
>> Do logos play any role for documents in the IETF beyond using it in the
> 
> None :-)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Cellar mailing list
> Cellar@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar