IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cellar] github org name

Reto Kromer <lists@reto.ch> Mon, 23 November 2020 07:35 UTC

Return-Path: <lists@reto.ch>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6C33A166D for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 23:35:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=reto.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S1xEbWmFGhkZ for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 23:35:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-bc0a.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-bc0a.mail.infomaniak.ch [45.157.188.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B7533A11ED for <cellar@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 23:35:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-2-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (unknown [10.5.36.107]) by smtp-3-3000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Cff7f46MbzlhfN9 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 08:35:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Castor (unknown [8.42.55.13]) by smtp-2-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4Cff7f1tPGzlh8T9 for <cellar@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 08:35:10 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=reto.ch; s=20191114; t=1606116910; bh=LBYaxnk18Iz2zTQb0Cz7wljfokeMLT2kyeUHKENpCZ0=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:From; b=gGtoi4To+O7hQGA/ouhPLVOGedNmxDgzYuKYw1zfuuQUGK07nl5PC1krZIXu+hd2l RODUp1rnwAD48SN1OpYDWlYmhAOKleXluaFHpMqzQFumTmQt9cse+/DBCwHgmNM6GT 3dN8P/q0QK6JBdcdjL9j7r5+bGqgasIicRRrJLQE=
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 08:35:10 +0100
From: Reto Kromer <lists@reto.ch>
To: cellar@ietf.org
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <89bcca5b-b6ba-c8dd-fe7b-eca1e9330843@mediaarea.net>
Message-ID: <r480Ps-10146i-F1D81CAF839E4FE1B3239995B79A7CCA@Castor>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Mailsmith 2.4.3 (480)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/b7bVhXntDvQ9puijGvXdVE6Vo4A>
Subject: Re: [Cellar] github org name
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 07:35:16 -0000

Jerome Martinez wrote:

>On 23/11/2020 02:07, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> RFC8875 suggests github organizations be named "ietf-wg-XXXX".
>> Our is named cellar-wg.
>>
>> Renaming is not required, but it seems like a good idea to me.
>> All of RFC8874/8875 are essentially guidelines, best current
>> practices, btw.
>
>I am in favor of the renaming.

I second this.

I don't have a strong opinion about logos.

Best regards, Reto

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email