[Cellar] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8794 (7191)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 30 October 2022 07:58 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cellar@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839A1C14EB1E for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 00:58:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tmdKYGAVzR1d for <cellar@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 00:58:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 079F6C14F73A for <cellar@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 00:58:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id AB205F650; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 00:58:52 -0700 (PDT)
To: slhomme@matroska.org, dave@dericed.com, moritz@bunkus.org, superuser@gmail.com, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: slhomme@matroska.org, cellar@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20221030075852.AB205F650@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 00:58:52 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cellar/ipnQIIsI6f0NCxkjJQ0F4HlaT3Q>
Subject: [Cellar] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8794 (7191)
X-BeenThere: cellar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission <cellar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cellar/>
List-Post: <mailto:cellar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>, <mailto:cellar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 07:58:57 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8794,
"Extensible Binary Meta Language".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7191

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Steve Lhomme <slhomme@matroska.org>

Section: 5.

Original Text
-------------
      +=========================+================+=================+
      | Element ID Octet Length | Range of Valid | Number of Valid |
      |                         |  Element IDs   |     Element IDs |
      +=========================+================+=================+
      |            1            |  0x81 - 0xFE   |             126 |
      +-------------------------+----------------+-----------------+


Corrected Text
--------------
      +=========================+================+=================+
      | Element ID Octet Length | Range of Valid | Number of Valid |
      |                         |  Element IDs   |     Element IDs |
      +=========================+================+=================+
      |            1            |  0x80 - 0xFE   |             127 |
      +-------------------------+----------------+-----------------+


Notes
-----
0x80 is allowed in Matroska so in EBML as well.

See https://github.com/ietf-wg-cellar/ebml-specification/pull/414

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8794 (draft-ietf-cellar-ebml-17)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Extensible Binary Meta Language
Publication Date    : July 2020
Author(s)           : S. Lhomme, D. Rice, M. Bunkus
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission
Area                : Applications and Real-Time
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG