Re: [Cfrg] Discuss/standardize Preview extension to AEAD abstraction?

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Fri, 18 March 2016 11:46 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C4E12D5BA for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 04:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.722
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.722 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rhjh5ZhADl7A for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 04:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com [23.79.238.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DF912D559 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 04:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5E53F404B; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:46:16 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com [172.27.118.251]) by prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063D03F400F; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:46:16 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1458301576; bh=CNtQh9cf9MwQSJgexgqU92s9MOCfZdHhYub6/wJQ3bk=; l=162; h=From:To:CC:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RK61VKuh5fBEiDg95chZp6NS8EnE1JYpI03Qc/LeH9U0iiPCOxABysDYIZXwU3Qq/ ZaxwH5sG9gJYR1RIIEyjUYL6W7OHEgWP1lCjVQ10zAd5dPK+tlyxQsRuNm2EKKpjPj C/KI6RZ8RXcgiwOAaaIRgad4mp80/5cw38BLE+0A=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-casadmn.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A631FC95; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:46:16 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 07:46:15 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1130.005; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 07:46:15 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "Paterson, Kenny" <Kenny.Paterson@rhul.ac.uk>, Bryan Ford <brynosaurus@gmail.com>, Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Cfrg] Discuss/standardize Preview extension to AEAD abstraction?
Thread-Index: AQHRgQepihOvqlnWT06P2Bcd9XDrfp9fFWQQ
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:46:15 +0000
Message-ID: <1de89949b6f343ddad5f7cc27211611b@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <8F1E4FEC-1FED-491B-BC6A-B00C27864414@gmail.com> <alpine.BSO.2.20.1512031055120.12629@natsu.mindrot.org> <21946846-1BFB-4170-8E8E-EC6A00BF3AED@gmail.com> <na6foq$s6m$1@ger.gmane.org> <B3F3C60C-8294-48D8-A572-59164DC5DD71@gmail.com> <D311901F.67219%kenny.paterson@rhul.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <D311901F.67219%kenny.paterson@rhul.ac.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.32.59]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/4qVFyqzqouRFnaw3Sc-dZWrJ4fE>
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Discuss/standardize Preview extension to AEAD abstraction?
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:46:19 -0000

> https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/059

Is there any change you could come to the TLS WG at the IETF and summarize?