Re: [Cfrg] Discuss/standardize Preview extension to AEAD abstraction?

"Paterson, Kenny" <Kenny.Paterson@rhul.ac.uk> Fri, 18 March 2016 12:21 UTC

Return-Path: <Kenny.Paterson@rhul.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9CE12D681 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 05:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.791
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.791 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=rhul.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pLgEaDyLZFJa for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 05:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am1on0619.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe00::619]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD0BF12D7FC for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 05:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rhul.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-rhul-ac-uk; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=3w3srzPDPNLOr+Sh1AG9xFj0fcV+P17XtUTnmDLAFCY=; b=LXabWFaXgixMQifq4vdE0ZImV+EB6PSPjol7Opis/rSug5qMwOS4rUJJOWmfSJeHkKuOjYy4DP8lTsPBefPeq3klO2mIiU/x7qVVdjSSOjEnGanNqe3uI6MnkWumE24DUfGo5/ZOjW5pG2yayzPqDhEPn66MpnGUEDkYXA4jhmo=
Received: from VI1PR03MB1822.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.166.42.148) by VI1PR03MB1824.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.166.42.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.443.12; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:20:42 +0000
Received: from VI1PR03MB1822.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.42.148]) by VI1PR03MB1822.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.42.148]) with mapi id 15.01.0443.014; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:20:42 +0000
From: "Paterson, Kenny" <Kenny.Paterson@rhul.ac.uk>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Bryan Ford <brynosaurus@gmail.com>, Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@gmail.com>, "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Cfrg] Discuss/standardize Preview extension to AEAD abstraction?
Thread-Index: AQHRgRCWKMl5NBJaMUi/K2CjQEWATA==
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:20:42 +0000
Message-ID: <D311A180.672F0%kenny.paterson@rhul.ac.uk>
References: <8F1E4FEC-1FED-491B-BC6A-B00C27864414@gmail.com> <alpine.BSO.2.20.1512031055120.12629@natsu.mindrot.org> <21946846-1BFB-4170-8E8E-EC6A00BF3AED@gmail.com> <na6foq$s6m$1@ger.gmane.org> <B3F3C60C-8294-48D8-A572-59164DC5DD71@gmail.com> <D311901F.67219%kenny.paterson@rhul.ac.uk> <1de89949b6f343ddad5f7cc27211611b@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <1de89949b6f343ddad5f7cc27211611b@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.1.160122
authentication-results: akamai.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;akamai.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=rhul.ac.uk;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [134.219.214.142]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2e6ac7e0-d492-43fb-fe2e-08d34f27b96a
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; VI1PR03MB1824; 5:QEfwF6T2gsURjipEBh35B1clPuAGiSqlO3c0gm7b6Pvj9ALwmw9451Y+pdFMFXtRpk0t8HSnIcMz4AO472qs14XaClRmjMcZZ4xNQgtYgS3lWGTG4hwNpLahXT0J3aaeo0tOMZ4Sz76S0FZze/d4Cg==; 24:/OqXG9ckLyy1s4pF6DxIVifWsVeMmhDG0mxAsdtmamztE9ty13KxmuKJYgf39hgKnGTpTvfOzTmQqIKDw6fb4sNLWAuojLDc+V1pu+sEUDw=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:VI1PR03MB1824;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <VI1PR03MB1824B402A1FB0CDE2C1DA7B4BC8C0@VI1PR03MB1824.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046); SRVR:VI1PR03MB1824; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:VI1PR03MB1824;
x-forefront-prvs: 088552DE73
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(24454002)(479174004)(66066001)(3846002)(93886004)(102836003)(6116002)(50986999)(19580395003)(19580405001)(86362001)(189998001)(586003)(3660700001)(76176999)(74482002)(1220700001)(1096002)(36756003)(5008740100001)(83506001)(2906002)(54356999)(5004730100002)(3280700002)(81166005)(2950100001)(2900100001)(92566002)(15975445007)(77096005)(10400500002)(5002640100001)(122556002)(107886002)(106116001)(2501003)(11100500001)(5001770100001)(558084003)(87936001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:VI1PR03MB1824; H:VI1PR03MB1822.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <695EE76B0AC66D4F8694BD624D564E06@eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: rhul.ac.uk
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 18 Mar 2016 12:20:42.2018 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2efd699a-1922-4e69-b601-108008d28a2e
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR03MB1824
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/mxf7Aq86eShnZIuzCSJhuPtAJR4>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Discuss/standardize Preview extension to AEAD abstraction?
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:21:18 -0000

On 18/03/2016 11:46, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:

>
>> https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/059
>
>Is there any change you could come to the TLS WG at the IETF and
>summarize?

Unfortunately, I won't be in Buenos Aires :-(

Berlin, yes, but that may be too late.