Re: [Cfrg] Proposed Informational Note: Security Guidelines for Cryptographic Algorithms in the W3C Web Cryptography API

[Harry Halpin <[e-mail]>]

On 11/20/2014 05:57 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> If you want this to be a CFRG-edited draft, that's great. As a few people have pointed out, it has some deep flaws, and having lots of eyes on it with regular updates would be valuable.
> 

Yes, that's the plan, as W3C will need the eyes of CFRG on it in the
future as well as new attacks and proofs are discovered.

We'll just watch the discussions on the preliminary version come in and
revise within a week or two unless there is serious disagreement between
members of CFRG. If theres is more or less agreement, I'll make the
edits and then formally submit this to be a CFRG edited draft.

   cheers,
        harry

> --Paul Hoffman
>