Re: [Cfrg] EC signature: next steps

Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi> Fri, 04 September 2015 20:35 UTC

Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 23:35:03 +0300
From: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
To: "Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL" <uri@ll.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <20150904203503.GA23602@LK-Perkele-VII>
References: <55DD906F.3050607@isode.com> <D2035132.531EE%kenny.paterson@rhul.ac.uk> <55DDA21D.9060302@isode.com> <55DF3E3C.7020206@isode.com> <55E42414.3020805@isode.com> <55E99B7C.6020509@gmail.com> <1822507ba15947761d52dadf31b88f52@mail.gmail.com> <55E9FC79.50302@cs.tcd.ie> <D20F7586.1E8D9%uri@ll.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <D20F7586.1E8D9%uri@ll.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/LYJxPnKbMHfVXtlr9sOmtmLfstg>
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] EC signature: next steps
Precedence: list

On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 08:26:28PM +0000, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL wrote:
> On 9/4/15, 16:18 , "Cfrg on behalf of Stephen Farrell"
> <cfrg-bounces@mail.ietf.org on behalf of stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> 
> >
> >If the cost of supporting any of the things Rene mentions is *any*
> >delay, I'm against.
> >
> >S.
> >
>
> It took us all a while to get here. If it takes a bit longer to get it
> right, so be it.
> 
> There’s ECDSA and EC-KCDSA for those who can’t wait any longer. :-)  Not
> to mention [F]HMQV. :-)

Also, Ed25519 (it is starting to pop up in various places)...

-Ilari

[Cfrg] EC signature: next steps Alexey Melnikov
Re: [Cfrg] EC signature: next steps Simon Josefsson
Re: [Cfrg] EC signature: next steps Watson Ladd
[Cfrg] EC signature: next steps Dan Brown
Re: [Cfrg] EC signature: next steps Ilari Liusvaara
Re: [Cfrg] EC signature: next steps Stephen Farrell
Re: [Cfrg] EC signature: next steps Dan Brown
Re: [Cfrg] EC signature: next steps Simon Josefsson
Re: [Cfrg] EC signature: next steps Ilari Liusvaara
[Cfrg] Side inputs to signature systems D. J. Bernstein
Re: [Cfrg] Side inputs to signature systems Natanael
Re: [Cfrg] EC signature: next steps Simon Josefsson
Re: [Cfrg] Side inputs to signature systems Michael Hamburg
Re: [Cfrg] EC signature: next steps Rene Struik
Re: [Cfrg] EC signature: next steps David Jacobson
Re: [Cfrg] EC signature: next steps Mike Hamburg
Re: [Cfrg] EC signature: next steps William Whyte
Re: [Cfrg] EC signature: next steps Stephen Farrell
Re: [Cfrg] EC signature: next steps Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
Re: [Cfrg] EC signature: next steps Ilari Liusvaara
Re: [Cfrg] EC signature: next steps Stephen Farrell
Re: [Cfrg] EC signature: next steps Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
Re: [Cfrg] EC signature: next steps Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
Re: [Cfrg] EC signature: next steps Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
Re: [Cfrg] key as message prefix => multi-key sec… Dan Brown
[Cfrg] key as message prefix => multi-key security D. J. Bernstein
Re: [Cfrg] key as message prefix => multi-key sec… D. J. Bernstein
Re: [Cfrg] key as message prefix => multi-key sec… Paterson, Kenny
Re: [Cfrg] key as message prefix => multi-key sec… Sven Schäge
Re: [Cfrg] key as message prefix => multi-key sec… Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
Re: [Cfrg] key as message prefix => multi-key sec… William Whyte
Re: [Cfrg] key as message prefix => multi-key sec… Bill Cox
Re: [Cfrg] key as message prefix => multi-key sec… Andrey Jivsov
Re: [Cfrg] key as message prefix => multi-key sec… D. J. Bernstein
Re: [Cfrg] key as message prefix => multi-key sec… D. J. Bernstein
Re: [Cfrg] key as message prefix => multi-key sec… D. J. Bernstein
Re: [Cfrg] key as message prefix => multi-key sec… Eike Kiltz
Re: [Cfrg] key as message prefix => multi-key sec… D. J. Bernstein
Re: [Cfrg] key as message prefix => multi-key sec… Simon Josefsson