Re: [Cfrg] Keccak worry?

Natanael <natanael.l@gmail.com> Mon, 09 November 2015 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <natanael.l@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000FC1B2BC8 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 05:58:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZEF_iamOPCJe for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 05:58:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 565B91B2BC7 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 05:58:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so33443172wmw.0 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 05:58:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=8oI/JH/Hdo9arKVA7RgNW2AwTp1aTDkRmzamquwX6vY=; b=ckrWQGA41a0ngif70VdX3kjcrigzlUHw+yyKT/B6FqZDHzcEz6GYfxbmhxEHAdj4aD xeSxQw7Vp24awqvC+q20SI9OogC4Db8ZnRMtmykbnk85DhaWuN3DYX7a8tP0lx8Li5qF MT70fTkGDxQSPHm61Ud02yCLDhvwCw5UICA+8JAf80SQ6OuHWWcApdF32PzUR3RGS2ev RmyNQkbvj5YPNPeupH7jAJGAShwdepWZT7ZPNklf9KptGipk0tLf4U4XlHRz95LPc7N1 aVfklepmjG2QHIC9XN0BzAH6paXs1+D0AU0/xW/Sr18ClS3ug3+b9KvBlm6OqqJpTyS2 zp1Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.187.41 with SMTP id fp9mr35166154wjc.14.1447077484890; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 05:58:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.175.33 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 05:58:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.175.33 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 05:58:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20151109124431.30339162.86317.9052@certicom.com>
References: <20151109124431.30339162.86317.9052@certicom.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 14:58:04 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAt2M1_9oWqxt8cRnc7n4p2i-KBe2zEyG_PTDt4zd8oT0YaqnA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Natanael <natanael.l@gmail.com>
To: Dan Brown <dbrown@certicom.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bb03a6e73112b05241bfbbb"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/eI98lGHWnFGKOsE6h9Mz9pG_0ao>
Cc: cfrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Keccak worry?
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 13:58:08 -0000

Den 9 nov 2015 13:44 skrev "Dan Brown" <dbrown@certicom.com>:
>
> ia.cr/2015/1085 describes a malicious variant of Keccak.
>
> Should we now worry about Keccak?

All I know is that it reminds me of this:

https://malicioussha1.github.io/