IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA

Tanja Lange <tanja@hyperelliptic.org> Sat, 10 January 2015 21:29 UTC

Return-Path: <tanja@hyperelliptic.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33DE1A0378 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 13:29:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.595
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zmjralmKboxe for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 13:29:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from calvin.win.tue.nl (calvin.win.tue.nl [131.155.70.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 964D51A0363 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 13:29:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 7701 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2015 21:29:42 -0000
Received: from pcdhz005.win.tue.nl (HELO hyperelliptic.org) (131.155.71.33) by calvin.win.tue.nl with SMTP; 10 Jan 2015 21:29:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 18932 invoked by uid 1000); 10 Jan 2015 21:29:27 -0000
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 22:29:27 +0100
From: Tanja Lange <tanja@hyperelliptic.org>
To: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>
Message-ID: <20150110212927.GG11760@cph.win.tue.nl>
References: <D0D6B088.5815C%paul@marvell.com> <CAMfhd9XTQB-QjMpkW9PQ1e7NaV5jc56KfRP12i6WLaiNGqUyRg@mail.gmail.com> <20150110204227.GF11760@cph.win.tue.nl> <CAMfhd9X7BLhL=n2LtMkAKHqbWLwDZcuneGuM1Hd_r2bh1zJaRA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMfhd9X7BLhL=n2LtMkAKHqbWLwDZcuneGuM1Hd_r2bh1zJaRA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/l7__v7Zc0h8e_Xn8S6ujwe2-mds>
Cc: "simon@josefsson.org" <simon@josefsson.org>, "mpg@elzevir.fr" <mpg@elzevir.fr>, "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>, "agl@google.com" <agl@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 21:29:24 -0000

> > This is not a typo, it is using a different (better) definition
> > of the curve constant which is what the implementations use.
> 
> Thanks both. I've replaced that change with a TODO to note why the
> formula will differ from EFD.
>
Easier option: we'll add the set of formulas to the EFD. Should do that
anyways. Will happen some time after Wednesday.
	Tanja

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email