[Cfrg] tentative agenda for CFRG at IETF 89
David McGrew <mcgrew@cisco.com> Fri, 28 February 2014 00:46 UTC
Return-Path: <mcgrew@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC9B1A01BC for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:46:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.047
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.047 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kFQA-dXOP7AG for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:46:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtv-iport-3.cisco.com (mtv-iport-3.cisco.com [173.36.130.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30C61A0186 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:46:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7205; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1393548412; x=1394758012; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject; bh=NDMNVFmTWNMdFafUVPryh15CL4wEgMZx6M5+xtLIOSs=; b=Xd+d/bwiNHchZHPY9ddzYg+4I/Ltdoavk2PVuR/VTjk0mFK9ln4v5LDw NQ/cuFZCF67ixsZU+UF9wCVoJLaGVrjtjUHGMItnYsYWatWo7vtFD6DD0 dKBGmt8j4stBo/nNlAj+tpHhj6cywrwuhS5CwCw7ohzok9mBbKWGwgAJ/ g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApQFAGbbD1OrRDoI/2dsb2JhbABagwaJcrlIFnSDJCoTDwcIEAMCAQIBDyUXAQwGAgKHYQMQxC4NhwwXjD+CNYQfBIlKjQGBbYZKhhmFR4NLHg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.97,558,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="104680178"
Received: from mtv-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.58.8]) by mtv-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Feb 2014 00:46:50 +0000
Received: from [10.0.2.15] (sjc-vpn6-544.cisco.com [10.21.122.32]) by mtv-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1S0koEh030283; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:46:50 GMT
Message-ID: <530FDC7A.4060404@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 19:46:50 -0500
From: David McGrew <mcgrew@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130922 Icedove/17.0.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>, Rene Struik <rstruik.ext@gmail.com>, SeongHan Shin <seonghan.shin@aist.go.jp>, "Igoe, Kevin M." <kmigoe@nsa.gov>, "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010805060707000400020309"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/oeJOPRX_NLnIePUG1idx3LJ6q1A
Subject: [Cfrg] tentative agenda for CFRG at IETF 89
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:46:55 -0000
Hi, the tentative agenda for the CFRG meeting is below. The plan is go over the status of all of the drafts, very briefly for those drafts that will be discussed later in the meeting. Then we will have some presentations on a bunch of interesting topics. Unfortunately, no one has volunteered (yet?) to give a presentation or lead a discussion on the new elliptic curve crypto mechanisms. So we will likely review the status, and then have a brief discussion. The TLS WG has asked for the CFRG opinion on ChaCha+Poly1305. We also should be offering an opinion on the new ECC mechanisms. Some questions for you: should we take on draft-ladd-safecurves-03 as an RG draft? Should we recommend its adoption in TLS? Comments welcome; please copy the whole list. thanks, David and Kevin -- CFRG @ IETF 89 Agenda Agenda Bashing Documents RFCs published OCB Review status of CFRG drafts: draft-irtf-cfrg-augpake-01, Augmented Password-Authenticated Key Exchange (AugPAKE), 2014-02-04 draft-irtf-cfrg-dragonfly-03, Dragonfly Key Exchange, 2014-02-03 draft-irtf-cfrg-zss-02, ZSS Short Signature Scheme for Supersingular and BN Curves, 2013-12-11 draft-irtf-cfrg-zssbn-01, ZSS Short Signature Scheme for BN Curves, 2013-09-11 draft-nir-cfrg-chacha20-poly1305-01, ChaCha20 and Poly1305 for IETF protocols, 2014-01-30 draft-urien-cfrg-cose-00, Cloud of Secure Elements(CoSE), 2014-02-10 draft-irtf-cfrg-cipher-catalog-01, Ciphers in Use in the Internet, 2012-10-22 (expired) Review status of other drafts of interest to the RG draft-ladd-safecurves-03, Additional Elliptic Curves for IETF protocols, 2014-01-15 draft-mcgrew-aero-01, Authenticated Encryption with Replay prOtection (AERO), 2014-2-14 Password Authenticated Key Exchange Presentation on AugPAKE seonghan.shin@aist.go.jp <mailto:seonghan.shin@aist.go.jp> DragonFly quick status update New Authenticated Encryption Mechanisms Presentation on ChaCha+Poly1305 - ynir@checkpoint.com DISCUSSION: feedback on ChaCha+Poly1305 requested by TLS WG Presentation on Authenticated Encryption using Replay Protection (AERO) draft-mcgrew-srtp-aero-01 mcgrew@cisco.com <mailto:mcgrew@cisco.com> New Elliptic Curve Crypto Status of non-standard curves DISCUSSION: feedback on non-standard curves requested by TLS WG Deterministic RBGs - rstruik.ext@gmail.com Consideration of new topics Post-quantum crypto Key-centric architectures <other?>
- [Cfrg] tentative agenda for CFRG at IETF 89 David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] tentative agenda for CFRG at IETF 89 Robert Ransom
- Re: [Cfrg] tentative agenda for CFRG at IETF 89 David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] tentative agenda for CFRG at IETF 89 Robert Ransom
- [Cfrg] Citing specs in specs Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Cfrg] Citing specs in specs Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Citing specs in specs Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Cfrg] tentative agenda for CFRG at IETF 89 David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] Citing specs in specs Paul Lambert
- Re: [Cfrg] Citing specs in specs Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Citing specs in specs Paul Lambert
- Re: [Cfrg] Citing specs in specs Paul Lambert
- Re: [Cfrg] Citing specs in specs Paul Lambert
- Re: [Cfrg] Citing specs in specs S Moonesamy
- Re: [Cfrg] Citing specs in specs Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Citing specs in specs Jon Callas
- Re: [Cfrg] [TLS] Citing specs in specs David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] Citing specs in specs Paul Lambert
- Re: [Cfrg] Citing specs in specs Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Citing specs in specs Paul Lambert
- Re: [Cfrg] Citing specs in specs Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] [TLS] Citing specs in specs David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] [TLS] Citing specs in specs Paul Lambert
- Re: [Cfrg] [TLS] Citing specs in specs Watson Ladd