Re: [Cfrg] IETF Networking Working Group proposal: Messaging Layer Security Architecture

The mailing list now exists.

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mls

On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> wrote:

> Hey Nadim,
>
> Yeah, a few of us were discussing this privately to get it to escape
> velocity, but it'll all be public from here on out.  We submitted a request
> for an IETF mailing list yesterday, so it should be set up soon.  I think
> an announcement will go out automatically on ietf-announce@ietf.org when
> it's created, but I'll try to remember to copy it here.
>
> --Richard
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 6:48 AM, Nadim Kobeissi <nadim@nadim.computer>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi there Benjamin & al.,
>> A lot of us have been kept in the dark regard this. Is there a mailing
>> list where future drafts can be discussed? How can one contribute
>> improvements, suggestions etc. for review and future inclusion?
>>
>> Nadim
>> Sent from my computer
>>
>> > On Feb 3, 2018, at 12:41 PM, Benjamin Beurdouche <
>> benjamin.beurdouche@inria.fr> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Simon,
>> >
>> >> On Feb 3, 2018, at 12:30 PM, Simon Friedberger <simon.cfrg@a-oben.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I haven't seen this being discussed here and some people might be
>> >> interested:
>> >>
>> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omara-mls-architecture/
>> >>
>> >> Unfortunately the MLSPROTO reference doesn't have a link. Does anybody
>> >> have more info on this? What is the intended use-case? What is the
>> >> attacker model?
>> >
>> > Here is the reference for the MLS protocol spec draft -00
>> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barnes-mls-protocol/
>> >
>> > Keep in mind that as it is an initial document, many of these things
>> > have yet to be discussed in depth and formalized… :)
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Benjamin & al.
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Cfrg mailing list
>> > Cfrg@irtf.org
>> > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
>>
>>
>