Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Consensus and a way forward]
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 19 December 2014 16:46 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483B41A8A15
for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 08:46:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3]
autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id nAAtWq8gF435 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 19 Dec 2014 08:46:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E4B21A89B5
for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 08:46:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-99-181.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com
[50.1.99.181]) (authenticated bits=0)
by proper.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sBJGkU4h057483
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:46:32 -0700 (MST)
(envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host
50-1-99-181.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.99.181] claimed to be
[10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0cnkdjEPGZ5Q1Nm+6OZJVdoj6X-ksc0X_atavQ+610MkXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 08:46:30 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <B9A2CADC-0635-4249-B3DA-4F7A8898B5B4@vpnc.org>
References: <CA+Vbu7ye3bytMZ-j8pfZixrjF8irTOoWmRo_GwjB0LphwjXq+Q@mail.gmail.com>
<20141202092847.29027.qmail@cr.yp.to>
<CA+Vbu7yQoYf3ei3MADhJ1iV6BcuqVUmkg8SkQ4ud=8m7pz7AvQ@mail.gmail.com>
<D0B0DC9F.39BD0%kenny.paterson@rhul.ac.uk>
<CACsn0c=uyPT6xa4CsXPeAV31QeeO+HfsCXAxt7Ba6NOt_Y2hiA@mail.gmail.com>
<CABqy+sr1T-VwQx1NaRA+xvnqVn7smjs2+YrG2Uz1Q+8M6c3hng@mail.gmail.com>
<D0B8EDCF.3A504%kenny.paterson@rhul.ac.uk>
<CACsn0cnkdjEPGZ5Q1Nm+6OZJVdoj6X-ksc0X_atavQ+610MkXA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/x7hCg7YID0jDfmARsCib0_MTkvU
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Consensus and a way
forward]
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>,
<mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>,
<mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 16:46:34 -0000
On Dec 18, 2014, at 8:52 PM, Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> wrote: > The > TLS WG does not want a generation method, but rather new curves. And > they don't want new "curves" but rather want us to do the hard work of > specifying a better mechanism. That. Please! --Paul Hoffman
- [Cfrg] Consensus and a way forward Benjamin Black
- Re: [Cfrg] Consensus and a way forward Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Consensus and a way forward Joppe Bos
- Re: [Cfrg] Consensus and a way forward Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] Consensus and a way forward Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Adam Langley
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Mike Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] Consensus and a way forward Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Cfrg] Consensus and a way forward Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Cfrg] Consensus and a way forward Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Benjamin Black
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Michael Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Benjamin Black
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Robert Ransom
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Adam Langley
- Re: [Cfrg] Consensus and a way forward Lochter, Manfred
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Robert Ransom
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Benjamin Black
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Benjamin Black
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Robert Ransom
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Benjamin Black
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Benjamin Black
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Robert Ransom
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Harry Halpin
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Tanja Lange
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Salz, Rich
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] Mishandling twist attacks D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Cfrg] draft-black-rpgecc-00-.txt [was: Con... Tanja Lange
- Re: [Cfrg] Mishandling twist attacks Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Cfrg] Mishandling twist attacks D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [Cfrg] Mishandling twist attacks Salz, Rich
- Re: [Cfrg] Mishandling twist attacks Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Cfrg] Mishandling twist attacks Adam Back