IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cfrg] Threshold signatures

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Fri, 03 January 2020 00:26 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783D512018B for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 16:26:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1pqRF_HpjaYD for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 16:26:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-f49.google.com (mail-ot1-f49.google.com [209.85.210.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E589120118 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 16:26:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-f49.google.com with SMTP id r27so59115747otc.8 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 16:26:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+nSApGGDq4b5RgAUOzKlFThmxudfMfJCbwXQU3JZlLw=; b=FgoEWxHM/ZjJa+GntPhlaaNrdHaYjJVy5BKVtFxnwGLzC9MrNwv4fd/t4v0RafBbgA TLPsTS9oVL/o3m0L/5NM91FejQTWLiZHB0rcq93+Kr/h7suEbkYh0rMFmKjQRV8zycQO q/q8hFk5sV2kvdGQan1ADvAs+kK4G9zLPm3tO5L5xgRxvpU5KRs3h8GVUEiTiN8s6dhT iDpUFIoFCq05rFOTUrZZqPERV5PdGe4a1LzDKFEf9z5bibbgiB2pjajAvArWLaJGzfdU +Ygo9HOkZ2hIfe6c106pSAXLWVunZ2LkuKORhEtuiuiZz4pLyg+UyRZ5RSKNjM0WZSLa RBuQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWKdW8a35hiGRoLpX5q8P7kOV7JmJjRhfAgW2JmshEhtoQWs1FL FUj1wIPJ7yUZCxlKkoutJaFx7wkgsVSethRpOlI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxePx7TgI3Gv6UB8J8nPJ/GDKrZmeVm4+ni8vxAfxlv7t0rItk7nh/H4tC3S+SN7oSZwe0J/Nxm1MCMKJ2t/j0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:147:: with SMTP id j7mr96744023otp.44.1578011205471; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 16:26:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMm+LwiXTA7UoFwSWE_c-cy_EdtYE5qFAm594UfFkdAVLNhimg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHOTMVK+XiKyGSW6mO3D_HK29jYE-YnxN-6f-fW_0jLLRuEUbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwg2W9S9HKqjTOhi825nTK_UsZemwYenbjGhDrVXiBW++g@mail.gmail.com> <CAHOTMVJMy+300vut73c7Z59P3d=666k=OZ6W9WZU0iuysZaMmQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHOTMVJMy+300vut73c7Z59P3d=666k=OZ6W9WZU0iuysZaMmQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 19:26:34 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwi_1HDZ3yE5xyg_WBmNOHTgGvB0k=GdxXAp+pUZvNj55g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>
Cc: IRTF CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005a919f059b315d3e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/z018IKtKMNggwZ_xK_NRE5KvSvM>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Threshold signatures
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 00:26:48 -0000

On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 4:42 PM Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 4:38 PM Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The big difference is that I want the threshold sigs to be plug
>> compatible with regular RFC8032.
>>
>
> That is the case for https://github.com/KZen-networks/multi-party-eddsa
>

I am not an academic, I have absolutely no interest in originality. What I
am interested in is whether a component works or not and how it fits into
the rest of the system.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email