Re: More comments
johns@ultra.com (John Seligson) Tue, 18 August 1992 16:02 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-chassismib>
Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (5.61++/2.8s-UTK) id AA01362; Tue, 18 Aug 92 12:02:24 -0400
Received: from ames.arc.nasa.gov by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (5.61++/2.8s-UTK) id AA01358; Tue, 18 Aug 92 12:02:16 -0400
Received: from ultra.UUCP by ames.arc.nasa.gov with UUCP id AA07240 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4); Tue, 18 Aug 1992 08:41:41 -0700
Received: from hotspur.ultra.com by ultra.com (4.1/Ultra-1.4-10-10-91) id AA19449; Tue, 18 Aug 92 08:41:11 PDT
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 08:41:11 -0700
From: johns@ultra.com
Message-Id: <9208181541.AA19449@ultra.com>
To: nob@sony.dowtyns.dk
Subject: Re: More comments
Cc: chassismib@cs.utk.edu
> I'm surprised to hear that there can be multiple instances of MIB II > on a per entity basis. Could someone give an example of when this might be > the case ?. A number of vendors have boxes which may support multiple logical bridges, with controllers associated with a specific bridge entity possibly spanning multiple cards. These bridge entities are purely logical yet each is addressable with regard to management traffic. Each entity maintains its own instance of MIB-II. John
- More comments Niels Ole Brunsgaard
- Re: More comments John Seligson
- Re: Re: More comments Niels Ole Brunsgaard
- Re: More comments David L. Arneson (arneson@ctron.com)
- Re: More comments David L. Arneson (arneson@ctron.com)