[cicm] Storing Identifiers
"Novikov, Lev" <lnovikov@mitre.org> Fri, 17 June 2011 18:52 UTC
Return-Path: <lnovikov@mitre.org>
X-Original-To: cicm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cicm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B979E802C for <cicm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6n+42uxF3M0f for <cicm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpksrv1.mitre.org (smtpksrv1.mitre.org [198.49.146.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D372C9E802B for <cicm@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpksrv1.mitre.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 2547121B1D64 for <cicm@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:52:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imchub1.MITRE.ORG (imchub1.mitre.org [129.83.29.73]) by smtpksrv1.mitre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C3021B1D5F for <cicm@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:52:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from IMCMBX3.MITRE.ORG ([129.83.29.206]) by imchub1.MITRE.ORG ([129.83.29.73]) with mapi; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:52:33 -0400
From: "Novikov, Lev" <lnovikov@mitre.org>
To: CICM Discussion List <cicm@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:51:43 -0400
Thread-Topic: Storing Identifiers
Thread-Index: AcwtH5mSk8xtebnwRAamBPgFwO4y7w==
Message-ID: <F9AB58FA72BAE7449E7723791F6993ED062C94CA93@IMCMBX3.MITRE.ORG>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [cicm] Storing Identifiers
X-BeenThere: cicm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: CICM Discussion List <cicm@ietf.org>
List-Id: CICM Discussion List <cicm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cicm>, <mailto:cicm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cicm>
List-Post: <mailto:cicm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cicm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cicm>, <mailto:cicm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:52:36 -0000
Girish, On 2011-06-09 19:27, Girish Nanjundiah wrote: > With regards to this, I should also mention that it would be best to > store the identifier in the CICM::Stream class. > [...] My proposal was actually more general: To store an vendor-defined identifier with ANY object. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cicm/current/msg00144.html For your specific situation, it would actually make more sense to store the identifier in the CICM::Channel object because a CICM::Stream is a CICM::Channel (and so is a CICM::Conduit). Lev
- [cicm] Storing Identifiers Novikov, Lev