Re: [cicm] Key Fill (was: Proposed WG Charter)

That sounds better to me. Let's go with that.

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Krishnamurthy, Hema - ES
<Hema.Krishnamurthy@itt.com> wrote:
> Maybe just say " add module events for symmetric and asymmetric key fill"
>
> 'Key Fill' is a common terminology.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cicm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:cicm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kevin W. Wall
> Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 10:42 AM
> To: CICM Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [cicm] Key Fill (was: Proposed WG Charter)
>
> Lev,
>
> You mean like an HSM, as an example of a key filled device?
>
> Seems like it should say something like "Key filled device" or
> "key filled interface" or "key filled action" or "key filled protocol" or
> _something_ then. The way it's worded is a bit odd as far as the
> English grammar goes.
>
> To me, that bullet reads as though some word is missing at the
> end. Even with your explanation (which now makes it makes it sense)
> it still reads very awkward to me.
>
> -kevin
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Novikov, Lev <lnovikov@mitre.org> wrote:
>> On 2011-07-15 08:14, Kevin Wall wrote:
>>>...[snip]...
>>>>
>>>>  * add module events for symmetric and asymmetric key filled
>>>
>>>               ^^^^^
>>>
>>>Is that supposed to be 'key field' ??? Because I don't get
>>>"key filled".
>>
>> From: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lanz-cicm-lm-00
>>
>>   $ key fill device
>>
>>      Devices that read-in, transfer, and store key material.
>>
>>   $ key fill interface
>>
>>      Set of protocols, electrical connections, and physical
>>      characteristics that comprise the connecting link between a key
>>      fill device and a cryptographic module.  CICM enables a key fill
>>      interface to be configured and actions to be initiated on a key
>>      fill device via the key fill interface.
>>
>> See Also:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lanz-cicm-km-00 (search for "key fill")
>>
>> Lev
>> _______________________________________________
>> cicm mailing list
>> cicm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cicm
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Blog: http://off-the-wall-security.blogspot.com/
> "The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts agree,
> is by accident. That's where we come in; we're computer professionals.
> We *cause* accidents."        -- Nathaniel Borenstein
> _______________________________________________
> cicm mailing list
> cicm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cicm
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be proprietary and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender.
> Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of ITT Corporation. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses. ITT accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
> _______________________________________________
> cicm mailing list
> cicm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cicm
>

-- 
Blog: http://off-the-wall-security.blogspot.com/
"The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts agree,
is by accident. That's where we come in; we're computer professionals.
We *cause* accidents."        -- Nathaniel Borenstein