Re: [cicm] Key Fill (was: Proposed WG Charter)

"Novikov, Lev" <lnovikov@mitre.org> Thu, 21 July 2011 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <lnovikov@mitre.org>
X-Original-To: cicm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cicm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C3C21F8757 for <cicm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 08:55:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z7P1d9a8EQsz for <cicm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 08:55:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpksrv1.mitre.org (smtpksrv1.mitre.org [198.49.146.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2272921F8760 for <cicm@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 08:55:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpksrv1.mitre.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F35C21B0C78 for <cicm@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:55:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imchub2.MITRE.ORG (imchub2.mitre.org [129.83.29.74]) by smtpksrv1.mitre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ACC021B0A88 for <cicm@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:55:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from IMCMBX3.MITRE.ORG ([129.83.29.206]) by imchub2.MITRE.ORG ([129.83.29.74]) with mapi; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:55:29 -0400
From: "Novikov, Lev" <lnovikov@mitre.org>
To: CICM Discussion List <cicm@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:54:37 -0400
Thread-Topic: [cicm] Key Fill (was: Proposed WG Charter)
Thread-Index: AcxDOjZsspEcT8f1SDK4/B5eSTkHvgEhBR2w
Message-ID: <F9AB58FA72BAE7449E7723791F6993ED062D1AB1C7@IMCMBX3.MITRE.ORG>
References: <F9AB58FA72BAE7449E7723791F6993ED062D0E5320@IMCMBX3.MITRE.ORG> <4E20B7CD.1040604@ieca.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E20B7CD.1040604@ieca.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [cicm] Key Fill (was: Proposed WG Charter)
X-BeenThere: cicm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: CICM Discussion List <cicm@ietf.org>
List-Id: CICM Discussion List <cicm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cicm>, <mailto:cicm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cicm>
List-Post: <mailto:cicm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cicm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cicm>, <mailto:cicm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:55:36 -0000

Sean,

On 2011-07-15 17:58, Sean Turner wrote:
> You could point to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc4949:
>
>   $ fill device
>       (N) /COMSEC/ A device used to transfer or store keying material in
>       electronic form or to insert keying material into cryptographic
>       equipment.

Good idea. There are probably several places where we can reference RFC 4949 better.

Lev