Re: another ID to look at

Brian Carpenter CERN-CN <brian@dxcoms.cern.ch> Wed, 11 October 1995 10:02 UTC

Message-Id: <9510110708.AA09371@dxcoms.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: another ID to look at
To: Geoff Huston <gih@aarnet.edu.au>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 1995 08:08:05 +0100
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Brian Carpenter CERN-CN <brian@dxcoms.cern.ch>
Cc: cidrd@iepg.org
In-Reply-To: <v0213050aaca0b7894e22@[150.203.6.83]> from "Geoff Huston" at Oct 11, 95 10:44:00 am
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 730

Geoff,

BCPs have to be submitted via the IESG in a sort of accelerated
standards-track process. This was submitted direct to the RFC Editor.

   Brian

>--------- Text sent by Geoff Huston follows:
> 
>  In message <199510041452.KAA21468@newdev.harvard.edu>, Scott Bradner writes:
> > 
> > 
> > The ID <draft-rfced-info-pi-vs-pa-addrspac-00.txt> has been submitted to the 
> > RFC Editor as an Informatiuonal RFC.  If you have any comments on
> > what it says or proposes those comments must be in soon. Please
> > send any comments to the cidrd list.
> 
> surely this is a BCP rather than an INFO-RFC - or have I got the interpretation
> of what a BCP is all mussed up?
> 
> btw I think it a useful document
> 
>   Geoff
> 
>

another ID to look at Scott Bradner
Re: another ID to look at Curtis Villamizar
Re: another ID to look at Geoff Huston
Re: another ID to look at Tony Li
Re: another ID to look at Brian Carpenter CERN-CN