Re: another ID to look at
Tony Li <tli@cisco.com> Wed, 11 October 1995 09:49 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07565; 11 Oct 95 5:49 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07561; 11 Oct 95 5:49 EDT
Received: from nico.aarnet.edu.au by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05909; 11 Oct 95 5:49 EDT
Received: from greatdane.cisco.com ([171.69.1.141]) by nico.aarnet.edu.au (8.6.10/8.6.10) with SMTP id PAA07438 for <cidrd@iepg.org>; Wed, 11 Oct 1995 15:39:08 +1000
Received: (tli@localhost) by greatdane.cisco.com (8.6.8+c/8.6.5) id WAA18833; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 22:36:37 -0700
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1995 22:36:37 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Tony Li <tli@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <199510110536.WAA18833@greatdane.cisco.com>
To: gih@aarnet.edu.au
Cc: cidrd@iepg.org
In-Reply-To: <v0213050aaca0b7894e22@[150.203.6.83]> (gih@aarnet.edu.au)
Subject: Re: another ID to look at
> The ID <draft-rfced-info-pi-vs-pa-addrspac-00.txt> has been
submitted to the
> RFC Editor as an Informatiuonal RFC. If you have any comments on
> what it says or proposes those comments must be in soon. Please
> send any comments to the cidrd list.
surely this is a BCP rather than an INFO-RFC - or have I got the
interpretation of what a BCP is all mussed up?
btw I think it a useful document
You'll note that the document was not submitted to the working group.
And the working group is not able to pick it up and run with it...
especially given some of it's more controversial comments.
So no, it's not currently on track to become a BCP.
Tony
- another ID to look at Scott Bradner
- Re: another ID to look at Curtis Villamizar
- Re: another ID to look at Geoff Huston
- Re: another ID to look at Tony Li
- Re: another ID to look at Brian Carpenter CERN-CN