IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Comments on MIME/SGML

Jim Conklin <conklin@ivory.educom.edu> Wed, 09 March 1994 14:43 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04552; 9 Mar 94 9:43 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04548; 9 Mar 94 9:43 EST
Received: from dimacs.rutgers.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07052; 9 Mar 94 9:43 EST
Received: by dimacs.rutgers.edu (5.59/SMI4.0/RU1.5/3.08) id AA23086; Wed, 9 Mar 94 09:10:37 EST
Received: from ivory.educom.edu by dimacs.rutgers.edu (5.59/SMI4.0/RU1.5/3.08) id AA23080; Wed, 9 Mar 94 09:10:35 EST
Received: from [192.52.179.3] ([192.52.179.3]) by ivory.educom.edu with SMTP id <83115(3)>; Wed, 9 Mar 1994 09:10:29 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 1994 09:10:26 -0500
To: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@hal.com>, Ed Levinson <elevinso@accurate.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Jim Conklin <conklin@ivory.educom.edu>
Subject: Re: Comments on MIME/SGML
Cc: Multiple Recipients of List <ietf-822@dimacs.rutgers.edu>, MIME/SGML discussion group <mime-sgml@infoods.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <94Mar9.091029est.83115

>>As to using text/sgml or application/sgml, I chose application to keep
>>within expressed boundaries others in the MIME community have
>>suggested.  Namely, that text be reserved for very simple things.
>
>Formally speaking, it's a coin toss.

Representing (I believe) lots of relatively unsophisticated users, I'd like
to push for keeping text reserved for only the very simple things, please.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email