Re: [clouds] preliminary list of Clouds WGs/SDOs/...

Bhumip Khasnabish <vumip1@gmail.com> Fri, 11 June 2010 02:02 UTC

Return-Path: <vumip1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: clouds@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: clouds@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C484D3A684D for <clouds@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.091
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.091 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.093, BAYES_40=-0.185, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xEPlNS3jsRH9 for <clouds@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5493A684C for <clouds@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn42 with SMTP id 42so615678iwn.31 for <clouds@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=2radxk8v/WQcffC3EU+PzH6Q4AcbuQmV8gG+LmIFggg=; b=Ox2eVF0/tGK52pDaapvNXkKE3Lu+EIo2qBRB81yIs+n6LR5OpAgGHTjo6Vae53li6O xf2AIl256WqB+Qd4KQaOgHxq6Elh5OIxvobdwCYqMLoxvJRQ194IyyAvFxBlMSq1TgAd PTyxeEHAOwv4kIzjEpgT9GOknFpmftXerZKRE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=www/tvZGB/Z3exiGMwY3ODaNp2okM9sM3cDUCU5txAiJJGi1jF3uM0iEPYNw41osBX QhRITaZeyRI/iE228tQmR9XvnqfHnDsRB12ol1P/MKLw5IG3kswdkkxmS19297rwu85z S/GSOcgqmuYgbYfymX8nAY2jde6edI/SM249Q=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.125.167 with SMTP id y39mr1026694ibr.93.1276221777864; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.58.200 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <p06240847c8360c6f372b@10.20.30.158>
References: <AANLkTilZ4XA4XJXsusfX13f7hsPqsj54MvGW9k1e5vCP@mail.gmail.com> <p06240847c8360c6f372b@10.20.30.158>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:02:57 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTinTAEzRFLKAQfpKdo1o-wi8VQ_l7iBNuurfTUYu@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bhumip Khasnabish <vumip1@gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e642d70eb9847f0488b7897b
Cc: clouds@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [clouds] preliminary list of Clouds WGs/SDOs/...
X-BeenThere: clouds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Clouds pre-BOF discussion list <clouds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds>, <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/clouds>
List-Post: <mailto:clouds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds>, <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 02:02:59 -0000

Paul,

Thanks. Yes, the intention is to do what exactly you mention ("whittled
down" the list).

We are starting with a larger  list and can/will  eliminate the ones that
are not needed later (with comments/reasons as to why we are not including
those).

Regarding the (C) sign, I understand. Do I need to add (C) IETF then, or by
default all emails sent to "xxxx@ietf.org" and their contents are
copyrighted by IETF. Thanks for clarifying this.
Best.
Bhumip



On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:

> At 10:38 AM -0400 6/9/10, Bhumip Khasnabish wrote:
> >Attached please find a preliminary list of Cloud Standards working groups
> (WGs), Standard development organizations (SDOs), etc.
>
> I strongly hope this is whittled down before the meeting. There are a bunch
> of organizations here that are barely related to cloud standards.
>
> >Kindly review it ASAP, and let me know whether any major ones are missing
> from the list.
>
> Just the opposite: there are too many here. Maybe the third column is for
> listing their activity in the area, but if there isn't much there, then they
> should probably be eliminated.
>
> >© 2010 Bhumip Khasnabish.
>
> Sorry, but that is completely unacceptable for IETF work, particularly a
> bar BoF.
>
> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --VPN Consortium
>



-- 
Best Regards.

Bhumip Khasnabish (Mobile:+001-781-752-8003, vumip1@gmail.com)