IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [clue] CLUE agenda for IETF91 - CLUE data channel

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Thu, 30 October 2014 17:24 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4229F1A03A3 for <clue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MKj6mJQ1uIAk for <clue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg22.ericsson.net (sessmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D2721A0395 for <clue@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-f79596d000001123-bb-54527447f0d0
Received: from ESESSHC017.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id A3.B6.04387.74472545; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 18:24:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.163]) by ESESSHC017.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.69]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 18:24:23 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: 'Simon Pietro Romano' <spromano@unina.it>, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, CLUE <clue@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [clue] CLUE agenda for IETF91 - CLUE data channel
Thread-Index: Ac/0ZlpbRdqQx2JLTMW34Xll6qBWUA==
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 17:24:22 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D4D6739@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.149]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D4D6739ESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrFLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvja57SVCIQd8JA4v9py4zW6zYcIDV YlvbDWYHZo+/7z8weSxZ8pPJ48eWp0wBzFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGbduTmcu2NfGWHF74U6m BsYPTYxdjJwcEgImEu/nLISyxSQu3FvP1sXIxSEkcIRRYv/s1awgCSGBJUDOZ/kuRg4ONgEL ie5/2iBhEYFsiRXLprOD2MICdhI7965kBCkREbCX2LZYBaJET2LP3KlsIDaLgKrErj1PwMp5 BXwlnv7dDLaWEWjt91NrmEBsZgFxiVtP5jNBnCMgsWTPeWYIW1Ti5eN/rBC2ksTaw9tZIOrz JR7ee8MKMVNQ4uTMJywTGIVmIRk1C0nZLCRls4AuZRbQlFi/Sx+iRFFiSvdDdghbQ6J1zlx2 ZPEFjOyrGEWLU4uLc9ONjPRSizKTi4vz8/TyUks2MQIj5+CW31Y7GA8+dzzEKMDBqMTD++Fh YIgQa2JZcWXuIUZpDhYlcd6F5+YFCwmkJ5akZqemFqQWxReV5qQWH2Jk4uCUamA0VZ622s9z PmNP6pZ5vryL5ry5Vrtb4XzlhdTyNLNDk0TnxXct1zlTPE/UvOzIbXfvWws+sP2Q1j1S/TGV V1D/WsGpV1JqtvEHrMTCbv4v7+V6nTr9RDPbyZT0OlvBWQEb/Zb//XR07uKHQpr/jlZnft1m 8HRz3Mcc1sxv/WfYJFv9rBL0nPuUWIozEg21mIuKEwGXRvqefQIAAA==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/clue/nWxMuTiz90lhwxR3ctTRDizKm4U
Subject: Re: [clue] CLUE agenda for IETF91 - CLUE data channel
X-BeenThere: clue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: CLUE - ControLling mUltiple streams for TElepresence <clue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/clue/>
List-Post: <mailto:clue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 17:24:30 -0000

Hi,

Regarding the data channel, I think there are two technical open issues:


1)      Are we going to use SHOULD for SCTP interleaving, or are we going to allow not to use it at all?



There are currently ongoing discussions about this in both RTCWEB and TSVWG, so I guess we have to wait for the outcome.



2)      Are we going to use “Richard’s draft” (draft-ejzak-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg)?



As we have discussed, we are open to use it, if it progresses. I guess it relates more to the CLUE signaling draft, though.

Regards,

Christer



From: clue [mailto:clue-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Simon Pietro Romano
Sent: 30. lokakuuta 2014 9:35
To: Paul Kyzivat; CLUE
Subject: Re: [clue] CLUE agenda for IETF91

Hi Paul,

I think that a total of 1 hour is enough for presenting both the protocol and the data model drafts.

Simon
Il 29 ottobre 2014 19:51:04 CET, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu<mailto:pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>> ha scritto:

You can find a very preliminary agenda for our CLUE sessions at IETF91:

     http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/agenda/agenda-91-clue

I tried to prioritize those things that need the most work, and that
have had recent action.

Note that for now I gave no time to the call flows, because there have
been no changes since the last meeting.

For the RTP Mapping, who will be leading the discussion? Roni or Jonathan?

I request that all authors/presenters please review this and consider
how much time you can effectively use. We don't have enough
discretionary time for followup, so if you don't need as much time as I
allotted please let me know.

And note that the agenda needs to be finalized by Monday, so I need your
feedback before then.

        Thanks,
        Paul

________________________________

clue



mailing list
clue@ietf.org<mailto:clue@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clue

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email