IETF Logo Mail Archive

[clue] comment on draft-lennox-clue-rtp-usage-0

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Mon, 13 February 2012 11:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E7621F85AF for <clue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:21:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.315
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.315 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.283, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sDLp7A2OTyRm for <clue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:21:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243B121F85B1 for <clue@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:21:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by eaal12 with SMTP id l12so1751724eaa.31 for <clue@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:21:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer :content-language:thread-index; bh=pJY1jkyTFvUwPhzAWUfUCRGUWTgboXfosqICKWDqLu4=; b=wLe8LPzTi1vJPcLh53z1XyPv4F1ecLHHnidzGoIGXbOT5hb4rwbZwIVvPhaJ6m9X0e WqWoEHXvrV2nFmTM4wJUq/5XdqkvcQsqEbqP1SK372L/DcaH6+If7ipTVxWP5shOKcCG XSLYTYBSjnm1W1/GUqX2SP3NOUY4/GREQjogs=
Received: by 10.213.9.8 with SMTP id j8mr2554103ebj.27.1329132090278; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:21:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from windows8d787f9 ([109.67.208.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z47sm59994769eeh.9.2012.02.13.03.21.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:21:29 -0800 (PST)
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: clue@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:21:11 +0200
Message-ID: <4f38f239.c77d0e0a.7414.fffff1b2@mx.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003A_01CCEA52.5C2331D0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Content-language: en-us
Thread-index: AczqQZbet2tZzr5TTIGnqnddD7r6fQ==
Subject: [clue] comment on draft-lennox-clue-rtp-usage-0
X-BeenThere: clue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: CLUE - ControLling mUltiple streams for TElepresence <clue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/clue>
List-Post: <mailto:clue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:21:44 -0000

Hi,

My view is that there are two separate problems that the draft discusses:

 

1.       The co-relation between the media capture and the codec information
in the offer answer

2.       Multiplexing multiple media streams.

 

I think that the second problem is addressed in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-holmberg-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation-00 

As for the mapping I have a proposal to use a capture set group in the SDP
for the ampping

Roni

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email