Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13
Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Fri, 18 May 2018 02:55 UTC
Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E23126E64 for <clue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 May 2018 19:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.879
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Td_3ekzbosxw for <clue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 May 2018 19:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F536126BF3 for <clue@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 May 2018 19:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Svantevit.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w4I2svwl050470 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 17 May 2018 21:55:00 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.local
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
To: Simon Pietro Romano <spromano@unina.it>
Cc: clue@ietf.org, Roberta Presta <roberta.presta@unina.it>
References: <a30828ea-1db8-fccd-9c2b-ddc0a1dcb08d@nostrum.com> <8D2EDAF8-014E-477A-AECD-79D944EA4503@unina.it> <ac30c041-b269-484f-023a-0e8723133a5c@nostrum.com> <216405E3-5A89-4FF2-9C89-CEDA03BF6A04@unina.it>
Message-ID: <3fdd8d7e-fcc6-7bac-0d03-3873973a875d@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 21:54:52 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <216405E3-5A89-4FF2-9C89-CEDA03BF6A04@unina.it>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------26C6362D5F1EF7AD56714A61"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/clue/tTUPkvrQ0k4VUcVebZzPYe96bYU>
Subject: Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13
X-BeenThere: clue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: CLUE - ControLling mUltiple streams for TElepresence <clue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/clue/>
List-Post: <mailto:clue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 02:55:03 -0000
[re-sending due to an IETF mailing list server outage] On 4/11/18 12:31 PM, Simon Pietro Romano wrote: > Hello Adam! > > We finally managed to get our review done. Please find our answers > in-line, [SPR]-prefixed, as usual. > ... > [SPR] We have not yet added this consideration to the draft. I > personally believe this makes sense. Do you think we should add this > as a general consideration when introducing the overall state machines? That would probably be an improvement, yes. ... > [SPR] We will keep this as an Action Point for us, to be fulfilled > before submitting the very last version of the draft. Just a heads up that I'm waiting for the document to incorporate these two open items before progressing it. Thanks! /a
- [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13 Adam Roach
- Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13 Simon Pietro Romano
- Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13 Adam Roach
- Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13 Simon Pietro Romano
- Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13 Simon Pietro Romano
- Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13 Adam Roach
- Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13 Adam Roach
- Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13 Roni Even
- Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13 Simon Pietro Romano
- Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13 Simon Pietro Romano
- Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13 Adam Roach
- Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13 Adam Roach
- Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13 Simon Pietro Romano
- Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13 Simon Pietro Romano
- Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13 Adam Roach
- Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13 Roni Even (A)
- Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13 Simon Pietro Romano
- Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13 Roni Even (A)
- Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13 Adam Roach
- Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13 Simon Pietro Romano
- Re: [clue] AD Review: draft-ietf-clue-protocol-13 Roni Even (A)