IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [codec] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-09

"Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe@xiph.org> Mon, 14 December 2015 22:56 UTC

Return-Path: <tterribe@xiph.org>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D4A1A1BC0; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 14:56:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.393
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.393 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HOST_MISMATCH_COM=0.311, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eWIRnIckyl2A; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 14:56:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.mozilla.org (mx2.scl3.mozilla.com [63.245.214.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A01171A02F1; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 14:56:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost6.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.mail.scl3.mozilla.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51701C0A7F; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 22:56:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mozilla.org
Received: from smtp.mozilla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.mail.scl3.mozilla.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D-tzSMW9W8wu; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 22:56:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.252.27.204] (corp.mtv2.mozilla.com [63.245.221.32]) (Authenticated sender: tterriberry@mozilla.com) by mx2.mail.scl3.mozilla.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A7D2C0599; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 22:56:29 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <566F491D.5020307@xiph.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 14:56:29 -0800
From: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe@xiph.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.26
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <86ACD2D0-02B6-473E-9E35-B9980166D9A0@nostrum.com> <566B4B47.9010809@xiph.org> <20151211235203.GN17678@hex.shelbyville.oz>
In-Reply-To: <20151211235203.GN17678@hex.shelbyville.oz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codec/2Kf42x5nECZgE56o7EVqUXrYyxs>
Cc: codec@ietf.org, draft-ietf-codec-oggopus.all@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-09
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codec/>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 22:56:31 -0000

Ron wrote:
> mapping.  Which means maybe it's also uncontroversial to add it too?

I think my preference would be to leave it out. We had many of these 
extension points in Vorbis (transform type, floor type, residue type, 
mapping type, window type), and there were never any conflicts. Having 
an explicit "255 == unidentified" mapping is already more machinery than 
Vorbis had. Let's not invent more complications we don't know we need.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email