Re: [codec] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-07: (with COMMENT)

Ralph Giles <giles@thaumas.net> Thu, 09 August 2018 21:48 UTC

Return-Path: <giles@thaumas.net>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826FD130F27 for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 14:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=thaumas-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rTEmCK9Y57xO for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 14:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x432.google.com (mail-pf1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFA09130EF0 for <codec@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 14:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x432.google.com with SMTP id l9-v6so3459762pff.9 for <codec@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 14:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=thaumas-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Yc88Ifo5RpcquRK4CyxfU9Y6hT1RoGwDTZ1HNGheUg8=; b=aYFQTeSXi5VVKThyZ56147HpPbK1fL9szz+khPMhOLhYCfRY6vyIqqNYQ5/O8AA+Y9 qnsbvyqlIqsucA+/NGICGGjRNVP7RqAWDTQvSeGdFzvgxfAJV2HSblSEW7IMHYL7StoA P64JFzuW8fyNNxR3jf2+sud3aSfk2HxuqYvSqNxIt4TeMz1zdKWw4FJA7H8ao/lGszln hFwru9Dd3EiNJCTpg98LRi6yIUC690AASUlExrgGc6LcvZKOOPCsA78pNBBzi7FYjsl+ jqsg/A54D+UpizAhd8rUG9ZbSK4fzfFxBnHNUDaGh0N2vLmGyCv3cXgvpc1eJ/58A955 FA0w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Yc88Ifo5RpcquRK4CyxfU9Y6hT1RoGwDTZ1HNGheUg8=; b=h7BbbkYwGlSTSi/KR/QO+hHJj4Xbm6VEMjdFjqVUMfbcvc+qiDlowvsw5GzjBm7sOD O734WcBZ61QXwgSXwZ8+4Xrw7v7hjytBCEB3rVoiZ1tMyDsT3/s6N6frvnDbFW+9MFC9 Yanjf7V/6p++bCsHiCT4MFBkyU840PYRTpiXwNvGK8r8uQEWXehMvCiBNxrHsJcmW1ow 7QXOfMeoxpt/ift3IzdwERPjUFhHAeKY7ELTgHiLg9H8BeV1+2CJMbWhmf9FAeH+ivQA ocxS6yXDPMfBAP6IzUHZc0Hzntb61ZLTD48PO+gBO8ls2bI3xBLaAX6/HvAJX+2dkW2c GvHg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlEze3lfRzzSg1JUSP3D+FlDSSrj/Vp5O9X/BZOp0LmpoShdFFTE b10kO4PtHL8KW3BErx0/luXIoA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPx5vbuqUkl+s6OQf1xMGol+7k+gZRWnrX5LnWwfJdVGfPWM7Zx2ZmOY1pHT+TaB5Xmp+VEwYw==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:9ed1:: with SMTP id f78-v6mr4105382pfk.35.1533851316451; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 14:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.215] (S0106185933484486.vc.shawcable.net. [174.7.172.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t15-v6sm13499666pfa.158.2018.08.09.14.48.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Aug 2018 14:48:35 -0700 (PDT)
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Jan Skoglund <jks@google.com>
Cc: Tim Terriberry <tterriberry@mozilla.com>, codec@ietf.org, draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics@ietf.org, codec-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <153297931466.7637.15045953147147693291.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+KMCSVVrNbZkqC_8UZr72EsGfD+9Jpt3Oan3iQ=R7B0nUJr+A@mail.gmail.com> <20180806175442.GN97277@kduck.kaduk.org>
From: Ralph Giles <giles@thaumas.net>
Message-ID: <17548084-d2cd-b8e9-7dda-661725a9ac8d@thaumas.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 14:48:22 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180806175442.GN97277@kduck.kaduk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codec/N7-L_KEGUzLzBZprMoZY1dDmt9Y>
Subject: Re: [codec] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codec/>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2018 21:48:43 -0000

On 2018-08-06 10:54 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>>> Section 8
>>>
>>> Sometimes I see a "Description" column that allows for in-registry
>>> visibility that a range is for experimental usage.  I suppose it would not
>>> be too hard to also modify the registry structure to add such a thing, if
>>> you want.

I think this is a good idea. How about something like:

   +---------+---------------------------+---------------------------+
   | Value   | Description               | Reference                 |
   +---------+---------------------------+---------------------------+
   | 0       | Mono, L/R stereo          | RFC 7845, Section 5.1.1.1 |
   |         |                           |                           |
   | 1       | 1-8 channel surround      | RFC 7845, Section 5.1.1.2 |
   |         |                           |                           |
   | 2       | Ambisonic channel order   | This Document Section 3.1 |
   |         |                           |                           |
   | 3       | Ambisonic with mix matrix | This Document Section 3.2 |
   |         |                           |                           |
   | 240-254 | Experimental use          | This Document Section 6   |
   |         |                           |                           |
   | 255     | Discrete channels         | RFC 7845, Section 5.1.1.3 |
   +---------+---------------------------+---------------------------+

  -r