[codec] #19: How large is Serialization delay?
"codec issue tracker" <trac@tools.ietf.org> Sat, 01 May 2010 10:46 UTC
Return-Path: <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C323A6AD2 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 May 2010 03:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.098, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o8vcJBEDReYZ for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 May 2010 03:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2a]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1283A67F6 for <codec@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 May 2010 03:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <trac@tools.ietf.org>) id 1O8ADM-0002sa-2W; Sat, 01 May 2010 03:46:28 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: codec issue tracker <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.11.6
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.11.6, by Edgewall Software
To: hoene@uni-tuebingen.de
X-Trac-Project: codec
Date: Sat, 01 May 2010 10:46:28 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/codec/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://svn.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/ticket/19
Message-ID: <062.f8b0d2abf056a9655a81ee25366bb354@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 19
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: hoene@uni-tuebingen.de, codec@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: [codec] #19: How large is Serialization delay?
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Reply-To: codec@ietf.org
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 May 2010 10:46:42 -0000
#19: How large is Serialization delay?
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: hoene@… | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: requirements | Version:
Severity: - | Keywords:
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Does it take longer to transmit larger packets? What is the typical
serialization delay of todays Internet links?
--
Ticket URL: <https://svn.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/ticket/19>
codec <http://tools.ietf.org/codec/>
- [codec] #19: How large is Serialization delay? codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] #19: How large is Serialization delay? stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] #19: How large is the frame size depe… codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] #19: How large is the frame size depe… codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] #19: How large is the frame size depe… codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] #19: How large is the frame size depe… codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] #19: How large is the frame size depe… codec issue tracker
- Re: [codec] requirements #19 (new): How large is … codec issue tracker