Re: [codec] Last proposal for the update draft

Jan Skoglund <jks@google.com> Mon, 20 June 2016 01:19 UTC

Return-Path: <jks@google.com>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D55912D888 for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 18:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.126
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.126 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NnOzs27fK1LZ for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 18:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22a.google.com (mail-ob0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2D3A12D887 for <codec@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 18:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id y7so5305248obt.1 for <codec@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 18:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=uccXYmPniCGNmmyS8NJ0JCFhIuEbZY1xY/dbYeuck/k=; b=dHQqhcK16c40DoJHJmm+u1QXzEa/4WyNnUIjSB2MBj8vqh7j9Q99p9OOIOWlFPjRVb rZw2bf0hw2mErt7ZDO10aChpDoKzi0VdBaZrZkNU/T+psJMUI8foqiluACtgu6PgX3zn nbIYGMild5Jggx5Ih9HD0Gu6Be3E5Z9CDso95+srwlZx9cOt9FoXlRXdJUqz616td0dJ tWiFBdcLeWDMoKgyRAp4czEY3CBh1xeG3pLcgTH52WHrHdlNE0bxgaTSk95L5CILBQHK aEnJdgBH61wIkJxT55jFZQj95bjcAZxdMB0ijR6s83cGngQIIMFAKqT6yueLWuM1T8N5 s13w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=uccXYmPniCGNmmyS8NJ0JCFhIuEbZY1xY/dbYeuck/k=; b=ix91nGUXooPpbI4jaV6rhwtmBsTiQuwZ2hmH4+X+AtaAYCUDMU7fg38GNR/GD2v2KN pzFDxPwBJFleaSmfFG1WavA0SGSyMQNNfBz2n9WH+y57orekFojkTi5ufFptn+0dUNqL C8Nbii+JJjf/YmVbDV85HeJoo7bG+2os6No0mv5NDcyKX4v9AtplzKMohdYjMmtEnSWO 2OAnWwowX9coTdAwF0GJLGFYYZ3R2OFkmyraMH1aP7S0H8ZizTMdYETAapXavZacaukr Ji2qAvmxmGmmlNuYnWPOMRhx8J9fu0GidR84wLoGrdyeU0NKKL87dLdcS5dljlqdZCTd IFHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIZr3t88q39d7FVcvJmyaJrvQFxdzfLu1VpvbCyd/qv7TaWzY/pTpJMngyu3lOe/ncf+krgOXlqLkTB2hlM
X-Received: by 10.157.22.179 with SMTP id c48mr8221247ote.35.1466385563664; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 18:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <d743fe38-a558-770d-9a23-2c37900b47ec@jmvalin.ca> <453aa47d-88a5-0da1-4696-7fa92d4237f8@thaumas.net> <20160619145533.GM2702@hex.shelbyville.oz> <005601d1ca2e$e2059ca0$a610d5e0$@symonics.com>
In-Reply-To: <005601d1ca2e$e2059ca0$a610d5e0$@symonics.com>
From: Jan Skoglund <jks@google.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 01:19:14 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+KMCSX7-zzgRRvKiKAHRVi591WbRzJ+URh8SyASffnsHKTCZQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christian Hoene <christian.hoene@symonics.com>, codec@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140bad8a094ef0535ab7e84
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codec/oRA2iptL6Au9EZ9N3tjREHYYdzs>
Subject: Re: [codec] Last proposal for the update draft
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codec/>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 01:19:26 -0000

I support, too.

Cheers,
Jan

On Sun, Jun 19, 2016, 8:31 AM Christian Hoene <christian.hoene@symonics.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 04:08:36PM +0100, Ralph Giles wrote:
> > On 2016-06-17 1:26 PM, Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
> >
> > > The fix does not impact compatibility, because the improvement does
> > > not depend on the encoder doing anything special. I also do not see
> > > any case where an encoder could have effectively used the current
> > > broken behaviour to improve quality over the proposed change.
> >
> > I support adding this refinement to the update draft.
>
> +1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> codec mailing list
> codec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec
>