Re: [codec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-codec-opus-00.txt
Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> Wed, 20 October 2010 01:23 UTC
Return-Path: <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5CEB3A697B for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.223
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.223 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.376, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cjymjrvl3C2U for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E02E3A6976 for <codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Received: from [192.168.1.14] ([70.81.109.112]) by VL-MR-MRZ20.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0LAK00167EM1DQ00@VL-MR-MRZ20.ip.videotron.ca> for codec@ietf.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:25:14 -0400 (EDT)
Message-id: <4CBE4508.8040000@usherbrooke.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:25:28 -0400
From: Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8
To: Jonathan Rosenberg <jdrosen@jdrosen.net>
References: <4CBDB9C7.1020206@octasic.com> <C8E30FAD.253DA%stewe@stewe.org> <005b01cb6faf$7867a750$6936f5f0$@de> <4CBDD672.2090202@octasic.com> <4CBE3B1D.8080105@jdrosen.net>
In-reply-to: <4CBE3B1D.8080105@jdrosen.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-codec-opus-00.txt
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 01:23:49 -0000
OK great! I didn't see any reason either, but was leaving the door open in case someone insisted. Glad that's not the case :-) Jean-Marc On 10-10-19 08:43 PM, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote: > IETF has a long history of standards with names - ICE, SIP, POP, IMAP, > etc. These are also acronyms, but increasingly the acronyms are highly > contrived and are basically names (DECADE, ENUM, SALUD) and in some > cases just names (Sieve). However, IETF has not ever filed for > trademarks on any of these, and I see absolutely no reason to start now. > > -Jonathan R. > > > > On 10/19/2010 1:33 PM, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> Hi Christian, >> >> I don't know the details of the ITU-T trademark issues, but in this >> case, the Opus name will not be controlled by any company (I'm not aware >> of anyone registering a trademark on the "Opus" name in this context). >> I'm not against the IETF owning the trademark, but I'm not sure any >> ownership is necessary to begin with. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Jean-Marc >> >> As a note, my company does use the term "Opus" in a different domain of >> application (digital signal processor architecture) and sees no issue >> with the IETF using it for an audio codec. Oh, and no, I'm not the one >> who originally suggested that name. >> >> On 10-10-19 01:02 PM, Christian Hoene wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> the ITU had some problems with trademarks that were given to >>> standardized algorithms. >>> As far as I remember, PESQ or PEAQ are trademarked by some companies. >>> Since then, the ITU-T name their standards only by numbers. >>> >>> I do not have any problems with nicknames. However, I think the >>> trademark issue shall be addressed and it is important. I would prefer >>> that such as trademark is owned by the IETF if possible. >>> >>> Uspto.gov does not list an opus codec. But I do not know how fast they >>> (or the readers of this mailing list) are... >>> >>> With best regards, >>> >>> Christian >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Dr.-Ing. Christian Hoene >>> Interactive Communication Systems (ICS), University of Tübingen >>> Sand 13, 72076 Tübingen, Germany, Phone +49 7071 2970532 >>> http://www.net.uni-tuebingen.de/ >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: codec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:codec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf >>> Of Stephan Wenger >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 6:05 PM >>> To: codec@ietf.org >>> Subject: Re: [codec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-codec-opus-00.txt >>> >>> Hi Jean-Marc, >>> >>> Four things: >>> >>> First, indeed, there was a hum at the last meeting. Weak memory on my >>> side. >>> Apologies. >>> >>> Second, hums need to be reconfirmed on the mailing list, and that has >>> not >>> happened according to my read of the email archive. >>> >>> Third, I also missed the submission of draft-ietf-codec-description-00, >>> which was really the time I should have complained. >>> >>> So I'm willing to assume (as apparently have the chairs, see point #2) >>> that >>> there has been an implied consensus of the WG to accept the >>> codec-description draft. Which brings me to point #4: >>> >>> As this is now a WG item, any major change requires WG consensus. >>> Selecting >>> a marketing name, IMO, is such a major change. "Opus" is such a flashy >>> name >>> that certain participants and/or companies conceivably may not like >>> it. For >>> example, if I were working for a company that has in its portfolio an >>> audio >>> product named "Opus", I would object to the name change. So the thing >>> you >>> should have done, IMO, is to send an email to the list saying "The >>> editors >>> consider changing the name of our codec to Opus. Is that acceptable to >>> the >>> WG?". >>> >>> It appears to me that twice you guys (chairs included) have taken >>> shortcuts >>> with the IETF's procedures, as I understand them. That, IMO, fills up >>> your >>> quota for the next couple of years. Please be more conservative from now >>> on. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Stephan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10.19.2010 08:31 , "Jean-Marc Valin"<jean-marc.valin@octasic.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> draft-ietf-codec-opus-00.txt is indeed a WG item. It has had several >>>> names >>>> in the past, including draft-valin-codec-prototype and >>>> draft-valin-codec-definition, which may explain the confusion. This >>>> is the >>>> draft for which there was a hum during the last meeting. >>>> >>>> Jean-Marc >>>> >>>> On 10-10-19 11:26 AM, Stephan Wenger wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I want to inquire the status of this draft. In many working groups, >>>>> the >>>>> filename "draft-ietf-<wg name>-xxx" indicates that the draft in >>>>> question is >>>>> a WG item of WG<wg-name>. Following this logic, it would appear that >>>>> the >>>>> "opus" draft is now a WG item of the codec WG. I don't recall a >>>>> decision to >>>>> than extent. >>>>> >>>>> If the draft were indeed accepted as a WG item, I would like to >>>>> encourage >>>>> those who made IPR statements related to it, to resubmit those >>>>> statements >>>>> with the new filename. This would help those of us who are searching >>>>> through the IETF IPR tracker by WG name (which is a very common >>>>> thing to do, >>>>> at least for me). >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Stephan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 10.15.2010 13:30 , >>>>> "Internet-Drafts@ietf.org"<Internet-Drafts@ietf.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >>>>>> directories. >>>>>> This draft is a work item of the Internet Wideband Audio Codec >>>>>> Working Group >>>>>> of the IETF. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Title : Definition of the Opus Audio Codec >>>>>> Author(s) : J. Valin, K. Vos >>>>>> Filename : draft-ietf-codec-opus-00.txt >>>>>> Pages : 12 >>>>>> Date : 2010-10-15 >>>>>> >>>>>> This document describes the Opus codec, designed for interactive >>>>>> speech and audio transmission over the Internet. >>>>>> >>>>>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is: >>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-codec-opus-00.txt >>>>>> >>>>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>>>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader >>>>>> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the >>>>>> Internet-Draft. >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> codec mailing list >>>>>> codec@ietf.org >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> codec mailing list >>>>> codec@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> codec mailing list >>> codec@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> codec mailing list >>> codec@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec >> >> _______________________________________________ >> codec mailing list >> codec@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec >
- [codec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-codec-opus-00.txt Internet-Drafts
- Re: [codec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-codec-opus-00.t… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [codec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-codec-opus-00.t… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-codec-opus-00.t… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [codec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-codec-opus-00.t… Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-codec-opus-00.t… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-codec-opus-00.t… Stephen Botzko
- Re: [codec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-codec-opus-00.t… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [codec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-codec-opus-00.t… Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [codec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-codec-opus-00.t… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-codec-opus-00.t… Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-codec-opus-00.t… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [codec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-codec-opus-00.t… Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [codec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-codec-opus-00.t… Christian Hoene