IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [codec] consensus call: guidelines and requirements

Jack Moffitt <jack@collecta.com> Thu, 25 February 2010 00:08 UTC

Return-Path: <metajack@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE7F528C242 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:08:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2HxemOqBNP6y for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:08:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FCE28C125 for <codec@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:08:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so1520217wyb.31 for <codec@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:10:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=oMwjhmjQI2a838qcq4e1h6OQXs6lNU+pVhuUp0vBFDE=; b=aysqbcK9jP8AutibPzMqiscwvLt/tTcojPh+fqvfjJlVleYjlNbyuL9qNJC5KLyvZD gUWT64CNQ6lGqKJQr91S9vvQZn2LFH125QLsjljKZA8CHUjyWvfUsRf8VEsOR6AfcpsO JEB5E3o98+G48FfUIVxEqjqndEtFZVXBYDrFQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=VtsgSz9JpXLWBTmkQFJ0j3tLXskw8n9EVDeKY5mX74iOKkuS8mBNtr06dJBV4iIFeT P5mXY76KZcdxqkVWOnNbTaUsKo4Jeq7EiV47PfK1ctImWACVbckcr9hcVfkwB9vjQlcW RIEirHGaq6EB9vBVCc/A/DJv9HzrPdeM6GY54=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: metajack@gmail.com
Received: by 10.216.182.10 with SMTP id n10mr243785wem.142.1267056610412; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:10:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4B84574A.5070204@stpeter.im>
References: <4B84574A.5070204@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:10:10 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: b776734c8ee8d291
Message-ID: <9b58f4551002241610n15d78941ufcea4558dc0272ff@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jack Moffitt <jack@collecta.com>
To: Codec WG <codec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [codec] consensus call: guidelines and requirements
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:08:08 -0000

> 1. Accepting draft-valin-codec-guidelines-02 [3] as the initial version
> of the Codec Standardization Guidelines.
>
> 2. Accepting draft-valin-codec-requirements-02 [4] as the initial
> version of the Technical Requirements.

+1 to both of these from me.

jack.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email