Re: [Codematch-develop] Site name - codematch

kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com Wed, 20 July 2016 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF3012D87A for <codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:00:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ka4zM4sD2Qw1 for <codematch-develop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A79612D842 for <codematch-develop@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id i5so75590118wmg.0 for <codematch-develop@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=A64UrN3GLpcRC8SaMV+A6rE82eXBkXQA+Cqz8HhlvCI=; b=YhBEzMfaNq4lTqrN0Ol1Gg1zjgq8FoRlCrICsJP5+QcVPDRpZH8IGKKpjkxaidoDuC mp8uhV4XsGaXkvrWix2sJ3qMcvQQFdyjC/y/5n+SCSP0k21+fNPMEvpd6RE+ngaasT2w hyGwNpJx9TtDf78Pm+KYzmtjobdXxeT4FlaH3FbyfpytPdLe/MHxG6k454mBgrkUWDib gCTgysZ592QDnMbYOqcdv6JxkaCMEXpO3C7yHdnPmwHABa/DxAqxiYPXy3clfzZEnoM+ 6E5VJNyFlDmKNNc8zq+Wb+uwVqULO8ml9wmvDzmx9n/wYeMKi8MaZFc4+V1nwMHO6CQ2 9PlA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=A64UrN3GLpcRC8SaMV+A6rE82eXBkXQA+Cqz8HhlvCI=; b=Vema9B9EhTunc4yiVus43BQGQ0XgpIOtv11Zmls1CX3dd+8a5QtwY1uwO1XeoWatml OOzu/+hFd8L5IOe2RNBUelEHdea4KZf4XInt9OSFrSIiNTWh9U0UmZPMRBPSZ+vPFW46 hTGl7boZHQ0KcLSb5wklcXCzPBBK3r9Aahd+1uhmouj9AqL4hMHJcaMqGb6WeTBbWzuv b2/imEXeF9Sh7AK8w6L8ZL7L7ixHPPLoyGmB3st0AoMKBF9I/RrXwV2rDvFgyWsSME62 mzdtWHZo7XBhqJ6ghvb/wHHJa6r9ad/p2QkXSoBkJLY0LVsl2F78/BJu2qNhsw9rmhF5 pj9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJY58sWeyCGh7sRyZjQ3LavtjWa63WEUxK+qLfc0BeM7eEFMHLsBNI16cQvvVJwAw==
X-Received: by 10.194.42.65 with SMTP id m1mr2103681wjl.56.1469030430028; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.29.20.121] ([62.214.2.210]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d62sm5807240wmd.7.2016.07.20.09.00.28 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13F69)
In-Reply-To: <A9CAC379-4861-4E34-B502-14E85B29230D@isoc.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 18:00:28 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <60485F4D-3011-4EA8-ADB5-938D8210DFA7@gmail.com>
References: <CAHbuEH6idTjeViwqj37GVW+omR0DUrifqt6jfNM5LStzXPRATA@mail.gmail.com> <3FFBDA46-0B36-451C-A3CE-5024A82191AF@isoc.org> <bc0bdca7-128c-f4c5-26cc-2de60fc09ea3@gmail.com> <88B39AB9-9794-4497-999D-E68E15A0AE4A@gmail.com> <A9CAC379-4861-4E34-B502-14E85B29230D@isoc.org>
To: Christian O'Flaherty <oflaherty@isoc.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codematch-develop/O-ua6RltP9ETyCfLPnp7qUneY9U>
Cc: "codematch-develop@ietf.org" <codematch-develop@ietf.org>, "carlos@lacnic.net" <carlos@lacnic.net>, "Alvaro Retana \(aretana\)" <aretana@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Codematch-develop] Site name - codematch
X-BeenThere: codematch-develop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Discussion forum for the planning, coordination, and development of CodeMatch\"" <codematch-develop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codematch-develop>, <mailto:codematch-develop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codematch-develop/>
List-Post: <mailto:codematch-develop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codematch-develop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codematch-develop>, <mailto:codematch-develop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 16:00:34 -0000

That sounds good, thanks!

Thank you, Carlos for taking care of the registrations.  If runningcode has not been taken, maybe we should register that - .org? In case we can use it.

We should review terms on Wednesday's call next week with this change.

Thank you!
Kathleen 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 20, 2016, at 5:22 PM, Christian O'Flaherty <oflaherty@isoc.org> wrote:
> 
> lets use RunningIETFCode now… We can change that in the future. 
> 
> Christian O'Flaherty  oflaherty@isoc.org
> Regional Development - Internet Society 
> Skype/Gmail/Yahoo!:  christian.oflaherty 
> Mobile/WhatsApp: +598 98769636
> 
>> On Jul 20, 2016, at 5:14 PM, kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com wrote:
>> 
>> RunningCode shows up as an application by a company in the Ukraine.  It also shows up vey prominently as an IETF term.  I'm not sure if we can use it or if we would have to call it RunningIETFCode of some variant that  breaks up the name.  I like it too...
>> 
>> Kathleen 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Jul 20, 2016, at 5:02 PM, Carlos M. Martinez <carlosm3011@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Actually Alvaro Retana came up with the idea. I just said I liked it a
>>> lot :-D
>>> 
>>> Any name you choose, let me know so I can create the proper DNS records.
>>> 
>>>> On 7/20/16 4:58 PM, Christian O'Flaherty wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Carlos suggested “RunningCode” as a name and I like it. 
>>>> 
>>>> Christian O'Flaherty  oflaherty@isoc.org
>>>> Regional Development - Internet Society 
>>>> Skype/Gmail/Yahoo!:  christian.oflaherty 
>>>> Mobile/WhatsApp: +598 98769636
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 20, 2016, at 12:11 PM, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> 
>>>>> We need to come up with a new name.  At the time we decided to use
>>>>> CodeMatch as the name, search results didn't show any use of the term.
>>>>> As it turns out, someone beat us to it and ironically it is a program
>>>>> that is used to detect copyright infringement.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This is unfortunate, but maybe we can come up with something better.
>>>>> Ideas are welcome.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Object of our application:  Connect/match code to standards
>>>>> 
>>>>> The code may be open source or proprietary and the standards can be
>>>>> published or drafts.  A mentoring connection is possible, not not
>>>>> required.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Proposals (more welcome and encouraged):
>>>>> 
>>>>> CodeStandards
>>>>> StandardsCode
>>>>> Connect Standards and Code (CSAC)
>>>>> Connect Code and Standards (CCAS)
>>>>> Match Standards and Code (MSAC)
>>>>> Match Code and Standards (MCAS)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Anything others?  Any preferences?
>>>>> 
>>>>> This may mean that we have to rename some other terms or at least review them.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Kathleen
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Codematch-develop mailing list
>>>>> Codematch-develop@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codematch-develop
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Codematch-develop mailing list
>>>> Codematch-develop@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codematch-develop
>