Re: [Codematch-develop] Site name - codematch

["Carlos M. Martinez" <[e-mail]>]

+1, it'd be really bad to have to shutdown the site now that it has been
presented and interest is building up.


On 7/20/16 5:22 PM, Christian O'Flaherty wrote:
> lets use RunningIETFCode now… We can change that in the future. 
> 
> Christian O'Flaherty  [e-mail]
> Regional Development - Internet Society 
> Skype/Gmail/Yahoo!:  christian.oflaherty 
> Mobile/WhatsApp: [phone]
> 
>> On Jul 20, 2016, at 5:14 PM, [e-mail] wrote:
>>
>> RunningCode shows up as an application by a company in the Ukraine.  It also shows up vey prominently as an IETF term.  I'm not sure if we can use it or if we would have to call it RunningIETFCode of some variant that  breaks up the name.  I like it too...
>>
>> Kathleen 
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Jul 20, 2016, at 5:02 PM, Carlos M. Martinez <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually Alvaro Retana came up with the idea. I just said I liked it a
>>> lot :-D
>>>
>>> Any name you choose, let me know so I can create the proper DNS records.
>>>
>>>> On 7/20/16 4:58 PM, Christian O'Flaherty wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Carlos suggested “RunningCode” as a name and I like it. 
>>>>
>>>> Christian O'Flaherty  [e-mail]
>>>> Regional Development - Internet Society 
>>>> Skype/Gmail/Yahoo!:  christian.oflaherty 
>>>> Mobile/WhatsApp: [phone]
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 20, 2016, at 12:11 PM, Kathleen Moriarty <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> We need to come up with a new name.  At the time we decided to use
>>>>> CodeMatch as the name, search results didn't show any use of the term.
>>>>> As it turns out, someone beat us to it and ironically it is a program
>>>>> that is used to detect copyright infringement.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is unfortunate, but maybe we can come up with something better.
>>>>> Ideas are welcome.
>>>>>
>>>>> Object of our application:  Connect/match code to standards
>>>>>
>>>>> The code may be open source or proprietary and the standards can be
>>>>> published or drafts.  A mentoring connection is possible, not not
>>>>> required.
>>>>>
>>>>> Proposals (more welcome and encouraged):
>>>>>
>>>>> CodeStandards
>>>>> StandardsCode
>>>>> Connect Standards and Code (CSAC)
>>>>> Connect Code and Standards (CCAS)
>>>>> Match Standards and Code (MSAC)
>>>>> Match Code and Standards (MCAS)
>>>>>
>>>>> Anything others?  Any preferences?
>>>>>
>>>>> This may mean that we have to rename some other terms or at least review them.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Kathleen
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Codematch-develop mailing list
>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codematch-develop
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Codematch-develop mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codematch-develop
>>>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Codematch-develop mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codematch-develop
>