Re: [conex] Splitting up conex-intial-deploy: effect on concepts-uses
marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es> Wed, 04 April 2012 20:18 UTC
Return-Path: <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCADD11E80FA for <conex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 13:18:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gS2Tw0eUNTzW for <conex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 13:18:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp02.uc3m.es (smtp02.uc3m.es [163.117.176.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FEC011E8099 for <conex@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 13:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-uc3m-safe: yes
Received: from marcelo-bagnulos-macbook-pro.local (18.8.218.87.dynamic.jazztel.es [87.218.8.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp02.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id C438B75A73B; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 22:18:22 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4F7CAC8D.5000804@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 22:18:21 +0200
From: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bob Briscoe <bob.briscoe@bt.com>
References: <201204041751.q34Hp4mU006010@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <201204041751.q34Hp4mU006010@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.3116-6.8.0.1017-18818.000
Cc: ConEx IETF list <conex@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [conex] Splitting up conex-intial-deploy: effect on concepts-uses
X-BeenThere: conex@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Congestion Exposure working group discussion list <conex.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/conex>
List-Post: <mailto:conex@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 20:18:25 -0000
Yes, go ahead, we can easily fix that in the new version after the IESG review (or in auth48 if needed) El 04/04/12 19:51, Bob Briscoe escribió: > Marcelo, > > I just noticed that conex-concepts-uses refers to conex-intial-deploy > as a convenient catch-all for all the deployment arrangements. > > Given we have decided to split-up intial-deploy, we will need to > update the citation in concepts-uses, to instead point to a number of > refs to various deployment arrangements. These are all currently > individual drafts. > > Are you still happy for me to proceed with splitting up initial-deploy? > > > Bob > > > ________________________________________________________________ > Bob Briscoe, BT Innovate & Design >
- [conex] Splitting up conex-intial-deploy: effect … Bob Briscoe
- Re: [conex] Splitting up conex-intial-deploy: eff… marcelo bagnulo braun