[conex] Splitting up conex-intial-deploy: effect on concepts-uses
Bob Briscoe <bob.briscoe@bt.com> Wed, 04 April 2012 17:51 UTC
Return-Path: <bob.briscoe@bt.com>
X-Original-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: conex@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F1721F87D5 for <conex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.700, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z4KsizOhqeMb for <conex@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hubrelay-rd.bt.com (hubrelay-rd.bt.com [62.239.224.99]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5040421F87D4 for <conex@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EVMHR01-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net (193.113.108.40) by EVMHR68-UKRD.bt.com (10.187.101.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:51:17 +0100
Received: from dyw02134app01.domain1.systemhost.net (193.113.249.13) by EVMHR01-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net (193.113.108.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:51:14 +0100
Received: from cbibipnt05.iuser.iroot.adidom.com (147.149.196.177) by dyw02134app01.domain1.systemhost.net (10.35.25.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:51:09 +0100
Received: From bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk ([132.146.168.158]) by cbibipnt05.iuser.iroot.adidom.com (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.399); id 1333561884400; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:51:24 +0100
Received: from MUT.jungle.bt.co.uk ([10.215.130.204]) by bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk (8.13.5/8.12.8) with ESMTP id q34Hp4mU006010; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:51:04 +0100
Message-ID: <201204041751.q34Hp4mU006010@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 18:51:07 +0100
To: Marcelo BAGNULO BRAUN <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
From: Bob Briscoe <bob.briscoe@bt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 132.146.168.158
Cc: ConEx IETF list <conex@ietf.org>
Subject: [conex] Splitting up conex-intial-deploy: effect on concepts-uses
X-BeenThere: conex@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Congestion Exposure working group discussion list <conex.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/conex>
List-Post: <mailto:conex@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/conex>, <mailto:conex-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 17:51:19 -0000
Marcelo, I just noticed that conex-concepts-uses refers to conex-intial-deploy as a convenient catch-all for all the deployment arrangements. Given we have decided to split-up intial-deploy, we will need to update the citation in concepts-uses, to instead point to a number of refs to various deployment arrangements. These are all currently individual drafts. Are you still happy for me to proceed with splitting up initial-deploy? Bob ________________________________________________________________ Bob Briscoe, BT Innovate & Design
- [conex] Splitting up conex-intial-deploy: effect … Bob Briscoe
- Re: [conex] Splitting up conex-intial-deploy: eff… marcelo bagnulo braun