[Congress] Second try at the charter
Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Fri, 17 March 2023 17:05 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: congress@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: congress@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75BADC1522D9 for <congress@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 10:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rSFcz1kaOc59 for <congress@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 10:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe30.google.com (mail-vs1-xe30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e30]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 325BFC1522C8 for <congress@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 10:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe30.google.com with SMTP id e19so5105950vsu.4 for <congress@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 10:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1679072722; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VUOIbck50w7VrGMZUcdKJRcudx3p+q8/Uyg1kvTKSxM=; b=Boii0RGzR55dVZ+cMM9YkdglnNvoSte7WRZx55ckEVTzffhgu7bbuUgvXv9AX0NJPB b+XqqaAL4/ZtumLfUWcpseqLqpOiAT9up5YbcYzIh1V0/IQ5RynuccKqYp350ygkoZzQ Iw/VTA1PeSifPob5GyUOfms4AVTACEN17qZowxViYh+qYayp9pdCBl7pdKEt8UndZ3qm emuWe/PQk31g5KmV6DadU6I3e9UW7utAwdhOIy6x0Mn0cniB1YyOQlFd4SdJQN8qa7EG f55H2rcCWGW2+9CsjpK8PqsUlNZS7xb5uD+Nl9QHZOZolDz4d2Sdmk8ZbHAlSMLqg13k RXUQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679072722; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VUOIbck50w7VrGMZUcdKJRcudx3p+q8/Uyg1kvTKSxM=; b=ivYDykxaomMiso8SWWhoaDbRAt4v73nt5JqmB4ETfQevE13ivBcG9zKAJyihhOf+VZ +K7itMBvve9DFAmQCPlW/IVW8XhCTTO6LCN3Lxhll61N7TaKp07y6suon2AzqsYx53WS eVqbXJeoZOGzoPIdXgjJKNQLts+HV0APH1a21V5YYSCxcA4b1y48PI5v6GlhtRnrsVkA HURUzbR4ihZsQkGKZARhqw191H+bA5AqcQzWU5COtJsM0idZGfLa5zFfL6YAtSmAbKqC PRTEROnXph0scK1P7pG11F36jXOB0QQ1cSta3SOsHB8OnTzj5D3qYGBjjov7ZtHFdeej f8OA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWQpKrAx94U3wM9CoU6FmPAWjGPuvjbzmF6JmWW0P951iwQcboz MBmtJH6JvfSYpWUa9yP6NUKRkI4KwlkH0pDt2YsA5hzbz/pLdQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8atYmzPDRCWtwudsOMwDRafwj76GCxwrUp2/gxLTypWjQwIB6CYrosfmN+zu6+nsSa+XbUa7DsVx8JOBv6MQU=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:c21b:0:b0:411:a740:c3ea with SMTP id i27-20020a67c21b000000b00411a740c3eamr372135vsj.0.1679072722386; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 10:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 10:05:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxS16AetosrVnOQJrbcMQ1wzKbP6D_mSCK=xzeGDt5nRtA@mail.gmail.com>
To: congress@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002b899705f71b9521"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/congress/ClrPZERS6yJQbSsQjuHu4EqEDSE>
Subject: [Congress] Second try at the charter
X-BeenThere: congress@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions about the CONGestion RESponse and Signaling \(CONGRESS\) Working Group" <congress.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/congress>, <mailto:congress-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/congress/>
List-Post: <mailto:congress@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:congress-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/congress>, <mailto:congress-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 17:05:26 -0000
The Congress charter didn't make it through the IESG. The feedback was that (1) they didn't like the very long enumeration of scope that was unrelated to the actual milestone (2) they didn't like the name. This PR changes the approach, narrowly chartering the WG to work on 5033bis, but encouraging a very rapid recharter as soon as there's further work it wants to adopt. There's no need to be precise about scope of potential work because it will be reviewed in the rechartering process. If we meet in SF and have good proposals, I encourage us to start work on recharter immediately afterwards: https://github.com/martinduke/congestion-control-charter/pull/35 After much playing around with acronyms, someone has a problem with every proposal, so I've elected in this PR to stop being cute and simply calling it the Congestion working group. Everyone knows what that means. The chairs, AD, and I are happy to move forward with this. Are there any concerns or objections?
- [Congress] Second try at the charter Martin Duke