IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Congress] WG name, please provide feedback by March 26

Reese Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net> Fri, 17 March 2023 17:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@tenghardt.net>
X-Original-To: congress@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: congress@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37830C14F736 for <congress@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 10:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tenghardt.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h1lp6BX58xCK for <congress@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 10:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hemio.de (mail.hemio.de [136.243.12.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C251CC14F726 for <congress@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 10:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from user.client.invalid (localhost [136.243.12.180]) by mail.hemio.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4BC0B2 for <congress@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 18:09:04 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tenghardt.net; s=20170414; t=1679072945; bh=tonqtqWXvZUzp04zlOp4+Iw2erftOMQUW1R7VIoHL4o=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:From; b=LbULb8DXYnhegnC1FtCgVmCnpZzQ1SpJXT61cppYp00ir+YSB7t1MU78XpjNpFCdw HI+fNEUzw65mnU6DUtA+MKdTJaiEqRyaBSrQN580sLu+F0Okvnnp6yTHhFXdt/IqLq r52JNgr9dbVMuP4f7ZX/Yh2QivmgiZsecW2T0xWhk0sDrnfYdPq5iLAlzviX2XFKVe o4y2WXI+axMoLdII4Ml6l+wUSENZXW5x4kJl3Y2kzDX5PsoajxjgmROcdetOEU+v9S 8fqmaICXu1DH3pBr0JhyzxN2gsO5Gu5Ux6WeimsRAiJUgxzw08Sg9IpDZTurK7tH41 pJLi61Z/H79Gg==
Message-ID: <69259b38-afb0-6e1a-8c7a-fc12746cca3a@tenghardt.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 10:09:02 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: "congress@ietf.org" <congress@ietf.org>
From: Reese Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/congress/zR6Nw5bfDpKbZxaSzF4ZsfkcrwM>
Subject: [Congress] WG name, please provide feedback by March 26
X-BeenThere: congress@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions about the CONGestion RESponse and Signaling \(CONGRESS\) Working Group" <congress.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/congress>, <mailto:congress-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/congress/>
List-Post: <mailto:congress@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:congress-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/congress>, <mailto:congress-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 17:09:17 -0000

Dear all,

Per the IESG review, there are concerns about the WG name CONGRESS as 
potentially misleading and causing needless confusion.

A few alternative names have been proposed, see this Github issue: 
https://github.com/martinduke/congestion-control-charter/issues/18

Please provide additional naming suggestions or thoughts (or 
votes-by-emoji in the Github issue) by Sunday March 26 EOD.

The chairs (Eric Kinnear and myself) will then make a decision.

Best,
Reese

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email